Suppr超能文献

通过瞳孔测量法评估间歇性与持续性光照对瞳孔光反应的影响。

Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry.

作者信息

Ba-Ali Shakoor, Lund-Andersen Henrik, Ahmadi Hamid, Brøndsted Adam Elias

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2018 Jan 16;8:746. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00746. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Continuous and intermittent stimuli with green light affect the pupillary light response (PLR) differently. Since the majority of pupillometric studies use blue and red lights, we investigated the effect of continuous and intermittent stimulations on the PLR using red and blue lights.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy subjects underwent continuous- and intermittent light stimuli, using red (643 nm) and blue light (463 nm). To avoid the influence of pupil size on the amount of light entering the eye, the procedures were repeated with the stimulus-eye in dilated condition. The maximal pupillary constriction and the early redilation phase of post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR) represented the mixed response of melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptors. The late redilation phase of PIPR (PIPR) was the marker of melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells.

RESULTS

Intermittent stimuli with blue light elicited significantly larger maximal contraction during dilated condition ( = 0.001), and larger sustained pupillary contraction under dilated as well as undilated condition ( < 0.001) compared to continuous light exposure. Except the PIPR during undilated condition, none of the PIPR metrics were significantly different between intermittent and continuous blue light stimuli. Intermittent red light stimuli elicited also a more sustained pupillary contraction regardless of mydriatic instillation ( ≤ 0.02). In addition, intermittent red light exposure resulted in a slightly larger PIPR under undilated condition ( = 0.02) and a slightly larger PIPR under dilated condition ( = 0.049). Except the PIPR to continuous red light stimulus, all PIPR parameters were larger when the light was presented after induction of unilateral mydriasis.

CONCLUSION

PLR parameters during and after light exposures depend on both the light stimulation mode and the entrance pupillary size.

摘要

目的

绿光的连续和间歇刺激对瞳孔光反应(PLR)的影响不同。由于大多数瞳孔测量研究使用蓝光和红光,我们研究了红光和蓝光的连续及间歇刺激对PLR的影响。

方法

17名健康受试者接受了红色(643nm)和蓝色光(463nm)的连续和间歇光刺激。为避免瞳孔大小对进入眼睛的光量的影响,在散瞳状态下对刺激眼重复进行这些操作。最大瞳孔收缩和光照后瞳孔反应(PIPR)的早期再扩张阶段代表了黑素视蛋白和视杆-视锥光感受器的混合反应。PIPR的晚期再扩张阶段(PIPR)是含黑素视蛋白的视网膜神经节细胞的标志物。

结果

与连续光照相比,蓝光间歇刺激在散瞳状态下引起的最大收缩明显更大(P = 0.001),在散瞳和未散瞳状态下引起的持续性瞳孔收缩更大(P < 0.001)。除了未散瞳状态下的PIPR,间歇性和连续性蓝光刺激之间的PIPR指标均无显著差异。无论是否滴用散瞳剂,间歇性红光刺激也会引起更持久的瞳孔收缩(P≤0.02)。此外,间歇性红光照射在未散瞳状态下导致稍大的PIPR(P = 0.02),在散瞳状态下导致稍大的PIPR(P = 0.049)。除了对连续红光刺激的PIPR,在单侧散瞳诱导后给予光照时,所有PIPR参数都更大。

结论

光照期间及之后的PLR参数取决于光刺激模式和瞳孔入口大小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/693c/5775973/6763c7b7b0c1/fneur-08-00746-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验