Bzowyckyj Andrew S, Stahnke Amanda M
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, 2464 Charlotte Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Feb;9(2):53-65. doi: 10.1177/2042018817745484. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
The objective of this study was to raise awareness of hypersensitivity reactions to human insulin analogs (HIAs) in insulin-naïve patients and encourage consistent and detailed reporting of HIA reactions.
A search of PubMed, MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts using the terms 'insulin' and 'hypersensitivity' was completed with English language, humans, and publication date after 1 January 1990 as limits.
The initial search identified 598 articles. These titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance (e.g. mention of HIA) resulting in the exclusion of 477 articles. The full texts of the remaining titles were evaluated in addition to each article's references to identify additional reports meeting criteria ( = 14). Upon extensive review, 118 articles were excluded for not meeting prespecified inclusion criteria, resulting in 17 articles.
Evidence supporting hypersensitivity reactions to HIAs was variable, potentially due to a variety of causes (e.g. difficulty identifying a true case of hypersensitivity reaction to HIAs). Inconsistencies were noted for the identification, confirmatory testing, management, and reporting of these reactions. Management strategies included use of insulin desensitization protocols, antihistamines, steroids, immunosuppressant/immunomodulator therapies, conversion to noninsulin therapies, and pancreas transplantation.
Complete and consistent identification, evaluation, management, and reporting of these reactions is essential. Specific aspects of the patient's history should be reported, including previous insulin exposure, the specific HIAs used, duration of use prior to the reaction, a clear timeline of the reaction, and discussion of precipitating events or confounding factors.
本研究的目的是提高初治胰岛素患者对人胰岛素类似物(HIA)过敏反应的认识,并鼓励对HIA反应进行一致且详细的报告。
以“胰岛素”和“过敏反应”为检索词,在PubMed、MEDLINE和国际药学文摘数据库中进行检索,检索限定为英文文献、人类文献以及1990年1月1日后发表的文献。
初步检索共识别出598篇文章。对这些文章的标题和摘要进行相关性审查(如提及HIA),排除477篇文章。除了评估其余文章的全文外,还评估了每篇文章的参考文献,以识别符合标准的其他报告(=14篇)。经过广泛审查,又排除了118篇不符合预先设定纳入标准的文章,最终得到17篇文章。
支持HIA过敏反应的证据参差不齐,这可能是由多种原因导致的(例如难以识别真正的HIA过敏反应病例)。在这些反应的识别、确证试验、管理和报告方面存在不一致之处。管理策略包括使用胰岛素脱敏方案、抗组胺药、类固醇、免疫抑制剂/免疫调节剂疗法、转换为非胰岛素疗法以及胰腺移植。
对这些反应进行完整且一致的识别、评估、管理和报告至关重要。应报告患者病史的具体方面,包括既往胰岛素暴露情况、使用的具体HIA、反应前的使用时长、反应的清晰时间线以及诱发事件或混杂因素的讨论。