• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨苄西林与头孢曲松预防剖宫产术部位感染的疗效比较:一项观察性前瞻性队列研究。

The efficacy of ampicillin compared with ceftriaxone on preventing cesarean surgical site infections: an observational prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Infection Control Section, Mae Sot Hospital, 175/16 Sri Panich Road, Mae Sot Sub-district, Mae Sot District, Tak, 63110 Thailand.

2Division of Nursing Science, Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthawaroros Road, Sriphum Sub-district, Muang District, Chiang Mai, 50200 Thailand.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Jan 22;7:13. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0304-6. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-018-0304-6
PMID:29387347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778626/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean surgical site infections (SSIs) can be prevented by proper preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Differences in antibiotic selection in clinical practice exist according to obstetricians' preferences despite clear guidelines on preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ampicillin and ceftriaxone in preventing cesarean SSIs.

METHODS

The observational prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Thailand from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2012. Propensity scores for ceftriaxone prophylaxis were calculated from potential influencing confounders. The cesarean SSI rates of the ceftriaxone group vs. those of the ampicillin prophylactic group were estimated by multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression nested by propensity score.

RESULTS

Data of 4149 cesarean patients were collected. Among these, 911 patients received ceftriaxone whereas 3238 patients received ampicillin as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The incidence of incisional SSIs was (0.1% vs. 1.2%;  = 0.001) and organ space SSIs was (1.2% vs. 2.9%;  = 0.003) in the ceftriaxone group compared with the ampicillin group. After adjusting for confounders, the rate ratios of incisional and organ/space SSIs in the ceftriaxone compared with the ampicillin group did not differ (RR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.03-1.78), and (RR, 1.62; 95% CI 0.83-3.18), respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate no difference exists between ampicillin and ceftriaxone to prevent SSIs after cesarean section. Ampicillin may be used as antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section.

摘要

背景

剖宫产术部位感染(SSI)可以通过术前适当的抗生素预防来预防。尽管有明确的术前抗生素预防指南,但根据产科医生的偏好,临床实践中抗生素的选择存在差异。本研究旨在比较氨苄西林和头孢曲松预防剖宫产术 SSI 的疗效。

方法

本观察性前瞻性队列研究于 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日在泰国的一家三级医院进行。从潜在的影响混杂因素中计算头孢曲松预防的倾向评分。通过多水平混合效应泊松回归嵌套倾向评分,估计头孢曲松组与氨苄西林预防性组的剖宫产术 SSI 发生率。

结果

共收集了 4149 例剖宫产患者的数据。其中,911 例患者接受头孢曲松治疗,3238 例患者接受氨苄西林作为术前抗生素预防。与氨苄西林组相比,头孢曲松组的切口 SSI 发生率为(0.1% vs. 1.2%;=0.001)和器官间隙 SSI 发生率为(1.2% vs. 2.9%;=0.003)。调整混杂因素后,头孢曲松组与氨苄西林组相比,切口和器官/间隙 SSI 的率比无差异(RR,0.23;95%CI 0.03-1.78)和(RR,1.62;95%CI 0.83-3.18)。

结论

这些数据表明,氨苄西林和头孢曲松在预防剖宫产术后 SSI 方面没有差异。氨苄西林可用于剖宫产术的抗生素预防。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of ampicillin compared with ceftriaxone on preventing cesarean surgical site infections: an observational prospective cohort study.氨苄西林与头孢曲松预防剖宫产术部位感染的疗效比较:一项观察性前瞻性队列研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Jan 22;7:13. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0304-6. eCollection 2018.
2
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin/cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section.剖宫产术中头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯唑西林作为抗生素预防性用药的比较。
East Mediterr Health J. 2004 May;10(3):277-88.
3
Comparison of ceftriaxone versus triple drug regimen in the prevention of cesarean section infectious morbidities.头孢曲松与三联药物方案预防剖宫产感染性疾病的比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Sep;21(9):638-42. doi: 10.1080/14767050802220490.
4
Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors.科索沃大学临床中心剖宫产术后手术部位感染:发生率、微生物谱和危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4383-7.
5
Standardized incidence rates of surgical site infection: a multicenter study in Thailand.手术部位感染的标准化发病率:泰国的一项多中心研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2005 Dec;33(10):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.11.012.
6
Risk factors for cesarean surgical site infections at a Thai-Myanmar border hospital.泰国-缅甸边境一家医院剖宫产手术部位感染的危险因素
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Sep 1;44(9):990-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.031. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
7
Antimicrobial Stewardship Reduces Surgical Site Infection Rate, as well as Number and Severity of Pancreatic Fistulae after Pancreatoduodenectomy.抗菌药物管理可降低胰十二指肠切除术后手术部位感染率以及胰瘘的数量和严重程度。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Apr;21(3):212-217. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.108. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines on surgical-site infections associated with cesarean delivery.抗生素预防指南对剖宫产相关手术部位感染的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Feb;128(2):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Ceftriaxone vs. ampicillin + metronidazole as prophylaxis against infections after clean-contaminated abdominal surgery.头孢曲松与氨苄西林+甲硝唑用于清洁-污染性腹部手术后预防感染的比较
Eur J Surg. 1991 Jan;157(1):45-9.
10
A randomized, double-blind comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam and ceftriaxone in the prevention of surgical-site infections after neurosurgery.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢曲松预防神经外科手术后手术部位感染的随机双盲比较
Clin Ther. 2001 Aug;23(8):1281-91. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80107-7.

引用本文的文献

1
State of the art: Intrapartum antibiotics in cesarean section, the infant microbiota and allergic diseases.最新进展:剖宫产术中的抗生素应用、婴儿微生物群与过敏性疾病。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jul;102(7):811-820. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14577. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
Ceftriaxone- and ceftazidime-resistant species, , and methicillin-resistant dominate caesarean surgical site infections at Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.在乌干达坎帕拉的穆拉戈医院,耐头孢曲松和头孢他啶的菌种以及耐甲氧西林的菌种在剖宫产手术部位感染中占主导地位。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Nov 10;8:2050312120970719. doi: 10.1177/2050312120970719. eCollection 2020.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年《手术部位感染预防指南》。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
2
Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.倾向得分匹配分析中的双重调整:选择一个用于考虑残余不平衡的阈值。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0338-0.
3
Failure to Redose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Long Surgery Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infection.
Compliance of antibiotics used for surgical site infection prophylaxis among patients undergoing surgery in a Congolese teaching hospital.
刚果一家教学医院接受手术患者中用于手术部位感染预防的抗生素依从性
Infect Prev Pract. 2020 Jul 8;2(3):100075. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100075. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Surgical site infection following cesarean section in a general hospital in Kuwait: trends and risk factors.科威特一家综合医院剖宫产术后手术部位感染:趋势和危险因素。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Oct 10;147:e287. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001675.
长时间手术中未重新给予抗生素预防性用药会增加手术部位感染的风险。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 May/Jun;18(4):474-484. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.164. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective.世界卫生组织关于手术部位感染预防的术中及术后措施新建议:基于证据的全球视角。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):e288-e303. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Risk factors for cesarean surgical site infections at a Thai-Myanmar border hospital.泰国-缅甸边境一家医院剖宫产手术部位感染的危险因素
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Sep 1;44(9):990-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.031. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Antibiotic selective pressure and development of bacterial resistance detected in bacteriuria following kidney transplantation.肾移植术后菌尿中检测到的抗生素选择压力与细菌耐药性的产生
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):1131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.062.
7
Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.常规给予女性用于预防剖宫产感染的不同种类抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 17;2014(11):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub2.
8
Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013.1990 - 2013年美国低风险剖宫产趋势
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014 Nov 5;63(6):1-16.
9
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.剖宫产术后预防感染:抗生素预防与不预防的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3.
10
The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.倾向评分方法在生存或事件发生时间结局中的应用:报告与随机试验中使用的效应测量指标相似的指标。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 30;33(7):1242-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5984. Epub 2013 Sep 30.