Suppr超能文献

不同桩系统抗折性的比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Different Post Systems.

作者信息

Saritha Mavari Karibasappa, Paul Uttam, Keswani Kiran, Jhamb Ashu, Mhatre Swapnil Haribhau, Sahoo Pradyumna Kumar

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Private Practitioner, Guwahati, Assam, India.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):356-359. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_413_17. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Abstract

AIM

The study was done to evaluate the fracture resistance of carbon, glass fiber, and zirconia posts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five human premolars indicated for orthodontic extraction were subjected to root canal treatment and obturated with gutta-percha. All the teeth were decoronated and mounted in acrylic block. Then, teeth were equally divided into three groups: (a) carbon, (b) glass fiber, and (c) zirconia post group. Post space was prepared and particular post was cemented in post space. Core buildup was made with composite. A compressive load was applied using universal testing machine and fracture force was measured in MPa. The data were tabulated, and statistical evaluation was done using statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, using one-way analysis of variance for analysis of difference and Bonferroni test.

RESULTS

Zirconia endodontic post had good fracture resistance (489.2 MPa) when compared with carbon (258.4 MPa) and glass fiber-reinforced post (348.7 MPa). Fracture resistance was statistically significant between test groups >0.001.

CONCLUSION

The present study concluded that zirconia had good fracture resistance compared to glass fiber and carbon posts.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估碳纤维桩、玻璃纤维桩和氧化锆桩的抗折性能。

材料与方法

选取45颗因正畸需要拔除的人类前磨牙,进行根管治疗并用牙胶尖充填。所有牙齿均去除冠部并固定于丙烯酸树脂块中。然后,将牙齿平均分为三组:(a)碳纤维桩组,(b)玻璃纤维桩组,(c)氧化锆桩组。制备桩道并将特定的桩粘结于桩道内。用复合树脂进行核修复。使用万能试验机施加压缩载荷,并以兆帕(MPa)为单位测量折裂力。将数据制成表格,并使用统计软件IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 21.0版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行统计评估,采用单因素方差分析差异,并进行Bonferroni检验。

结果

与碳纤维桩(258.4 MPa)和玻璃纤维增强桩(348.7 MPa)相比,氧化锆根管桩具有良好的抗折性能(489.2 MPa)。各试验组之间的抗折性能差异具有统计学意义(>0.001)。

结论

本研究得出结论,与玻璃纤维桩和碳纤维桩相比,氧化锆桩具有良好的抗折性能。

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Different Post Systems.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Nov-Dec;7(6):356-359. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_413_17. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
7
An Evaluation of Fracture Resistance Strength of Different Post Systems in Endodontically Treated Teeth.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S236-S239. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_306_18.
8
Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems.
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):431-7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123227.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots Restored with Fiber Posts Using Different Resin Cements- An In-vitro Study.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):ZC52-ZC55. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21167.9387. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature.
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.026. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Fracture resistance of thin-walled roots restored with different post systems.
Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):997-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01609.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验