Kurthukoti Ameet J, Paul Jaya, Gandhi Kapil, Rao Divya B J
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Jodhpur Dental College General Hospital, Jodhpur National University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Oct-Dec;33(4):296-301. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.165675.
Esthetic coronal reconstruction of fractured anterior teeth is often performed using intra radicular posts. Most of the commonly used commercially esthetic post systems do not exhibit similar physical properties as dentin resulting in failures.
To evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of simulated traumatized permanent central incisors restored with three different post systems including biologic dentin posts.
A total of 40 recently extracted human maxillary central incisors with similar dimensions were decoronated 2 mm above the cemento-enamel junction and endodontically treated. Ten specimens were randomly selected as the Group I - Control group (core built teeth without intraradicular posts). The remaining 30 teeth were equally divided and restored with zirconia (Group II, n = 10), fiber re-inforced composite (FRC) (Group III, n = 10) and biologic dentin posts (Group IV, n = 10) using resin bonded cement and their cores built-up. These samples were embedded in acrylic resin and then secured in a Universal Testing Machine and subjected to fracture resistance testing. The location of failure in the specimens was evaluated using a stereomicroscope.
Intergroup comparison revealed that the control group and zirconia post group (522 ± 110 N) demonstrated the least fracture resistance, while dentin post group (721 ± 127 N) the highest. There was no statistically significant difference between fiber post and dentin post groups. Fractures that were repairable were observed in fiber post and dentin post groups, whereas mostly unrestorable, catastrophic fractures were observed in the zirconia post group.
Teeth restored with the biologic dentin post system demonstrated the highest fracture resistance and repairable fractures, closely followed by FRC post system. The least fracture resistance and most catastrophic fractures were demonstrated by the zirconia post system.
前牙折断后的美学冠修复通常使用根管内桩。大多数常用的市售美学桩系统的物理性能与牙本质不同,导致修复失败。
评估并比较用三种不同桩系统(包括生物牙本质桩)修复的模拟创伤恒中切牙的抗折性能及失败模式。
选取40颗近期拔除的尺寸相近的人上颌中切牙,在牙骨质-釉质界上方2mm处截冠并进行根管治疗。随机选取10个样本作为I组——对照组(未使用根管内桩构建核的牙齿)。其余30颗牙齿平均分为三组,分别用氧化锆(II组,n = 10)、纤维增强复合材料(FRC)(III组,n = 10)和生物牙本质桩(IV组,n = 10),使用树脂粘结水门汀进行修复并构建核。将这些样本嵌入丙烯酸树脂中,然后固定在万能试验机上进行抗折性能测试。使用体视显微镜评估样本的失败位置。
组间比较显示,对照组和氧化锆桩组(522±110N)的抗折性能最低,而牙本质桩组(721±127N)最高。纤维桩组和牙本质桩组之间无统计学显著差异。纤维桩组和牙本质桩组观察到可修复的骨折,而氧化锆桩组大多观察到不可修复的灾难性骨折。
用生物牙本质桩系统修复的牙齿表现出最高的抗折性能和可修复性骨折,其次是FRC桩系统。氧化锆桩系统的抗折性能最低,灾难性骨折最多。