J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;118(2):308-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.012.
Children who are picky eaters typically demonstrate persistent food refusal and poor diet quality and may be resistant to intervention.
This study tested whether pickiness moderated the effect of a nutrition intervention on diet quality in youth with type 1 diabetes, hypothesizing that the intervention effect would be smaller among picky relative to nonpicky eaters.
The study was an 18-month randomized clinical trial.
Youth age 8.0 to 16.9 years (n=136) with type 1 diabetes duration ≥1 year, receiving care at an outpatient diabetes center in Boston, MA, and a parent, participated from 2010 to 2013.
The intervention integrated motivational interviewing, active learning, and applied problem solving to increase whole plant food intake.
Whole plant food density (WPFD, cup/oz equivalents per 1,000 kcal target food groups), Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI2005, measures conformance to US dietary guidelines), and dietary variety were calculated from 3-day food records completed at six different times. Parents completed the pickiness subscale of the Child Feeding Questionnaire.
Mean WPFD and HEI2005 were estimated using the population ratio method; standard errors were computed using jackknife variance-covariance estimation. Overall P value comparing groups across visits was derived using the χ test.
Baseline diet quality was lower in picky than in nonpicky eaters. No intervention effect on pickiness or dietary variety was seen. In stratified analyses, the intervention effect on diet quality was significant for picky eaters only (WPFD P=0.0003; HEI2005 P=0.04). Among picky eaters, diet quality in the treatment group improved, whereas diet quality in the control group remained low. Diet quality of nonpicky eaters in the intervention group changed to a lesser degree.
The intervention resulted in increased diet quality in picky eaters, whereas no intervention effect was seen in nonpicky eaters. Findings suggest that diet quality of picky eaters can be improved without changing their underlying pickiness.
挑食的儿童通常表现出持续的食物拒绝和较差的饮食质量,并且可能对干预措施有抵抗力。
本研究测试了在 1 型糖尿病青少年中,挑食是否会影响营养干预对饮食质量的影响,假设干预效果在挑食者中相对非挑食者会更小。
该研究是一项为期 18 个月的随机临床试验。
2010 年至 2013 年,年龄在 8.0 至 16.9 岁(n=136),患有 1 型糖尿病≥1 年,在马萨诸塞州波士顿的一家门诊糖尿病中心接受治疗,并由一名家长参与。
该干预措施综合了动机访谈、主动学习和应用问题解决,以增加全植物性食物的摄入量。
全植物食物密度(WPFD,以杯/盎司等效物/ 1000 千卡目标食物组计算)、健康饮食指数-2005(HEI2005,衡量符合美国饮食指南的情况)和饮食多样性,由六次不同时间完成的三天食物记录计算得出。父母完成了儿童喂养问卷的挑食子量表。
使用人群比法估计 WPFD 和 HEI2005 的平均值;使用 Jackknife 方差协方差估计计算标准误差。使用 χ 检验得出比较各次访问时组间的总体 P 值。
挑食者的基线饮食质量低于非挑食者。没有观察到对挑食或饮食多样性的干预效果。在分层分析中,干预对饮食质量的影响仅在挑食者中显著(WPFD P=0.0003;HEI2005 P=0.04)。在挑食者中,治疗组的饮食质量有所改善,而对照组的饮食质量仍然较低。干预组中非挑食者的饮食质量变化程度较小。
干预措施使挑食者的饮食质量提高,而非挑食者则没有观察到干预效果。研究结果表明,无需改变挑食者的基本挑食行为,就可以改善其饮食质量。