Scher Corey S
New York University School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, New York City, New York, USA.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Apr;31(2):238-242. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000556.
The percentage of people over the age of 65 is growing rapidly and anesthesiologists must develop a medical understanding that is comprehensive to meet the unique medical needs of this population. The changing physiology of an elderly population makes them extremely vulnerable to trauma and the administration of blood products. Although most of these cases involve orthopedic attention, it is not less dangerous as a blunt trauma case.
This article addresses some of the main concerns for the anesthesiologists of providing a hemostatic resuscitation in the geriatric population. Should blood that is new lead to better outcomes than blood that was collected more than 14 days from the injury? What role does patient frailty have in trauma and transfusion outcomes? Is the massive transfusion protocol safe for the geriatric population? As this subset of the population grows, the number of patients on anticoagulation therapy will grow. Knowledge of the bone marrow plays an important role in geriatric trauma. How does head trauma in the elderly differ from the younger patient?
The information in this article is by no means comprehensive. Nongeriatric trauma protocols are far from being validated. Applying these protocols to the geriatric protocols must be investigated in terms of safety and benefits.
65岁以上人群的比例正在迅速增长,麻醉医生必须形成全面的医学认识,以满足该人群独特的医疗需求。老年人群不断变化的生理机能使他们极易受到创伤和输血的影响。尽管这些病例大多涉及骨科治疗,但钝性创伤病例同样危险。
本文探讨了麻醉医生在老年人群中进行止血复苏时的一些主要问题。新鲜血液是否比受伤14天以上采集的血液能带来更好的治疗效果?患者虚弱在创伤和输血结果中起什么作用?大量输血方案对老年人群是否安全?随着这部分人群的增加,接受抗凝治疗的患者数量也会增加。骨髓知识在老年创伤中起着重要作用。老年人的头部创伤与年轻患者有何不同?
本文中的信息绝非全面。非老年创伤方案远未得到验证。必须从安全性和益处方面研究将这些方案应用于老年方案的情况。