Parker G, Holmes S, Manicavasagar V
J Affect Disord. 1986 Jan-Feb;10(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(86)90046-7.
Assessment of 564 routine attenders of 12 Sydney general practices established that 25% of the women and 17% of the men scored as "potential depressives". Thirty-five agreed to an interview and review over 6 months, with 83% of this group initially rating as a "psychiatric case" on the Present State Examination. The sample could be characterized as being chronically depressed (mean duration of 9 months), as predominantly (86%) female, in having relatively stable but dysfunctional relationships, and by having experienced chronic and acute-on-chronic stressors. The degree of which subjects improved in the following 20 weeks could be predicted by their degree of improvement in the first few weeks and as early as the 6th day after assessment. While overall improvement was minimal, several baseline predictors of a better outcome were suggested: a history of having episodic or recurrent episodes, a more severe depression, lower social class, break-up of an intimate relationship as a precipitant, a neutralizing life event and family support. Married subjects and those with young children had a poor outcome.
对悉尼12家普通诊所的564名常规就诊者进行的评估表明,25%的女性和17%的男性被评定为“潜在抑郁症患者”。35人同意接受为期6个月的访谈和复查,该组中83%的人在目前状态检查中最初被评定为“精神病例”。该样本的特征为长期抑郁(平均病程9个月)、以女性为主(86%)、人际关系相对稳定但功能失调,且经历过慢性和慢性应激源。受试者在接下来20周内的改善程度可以通过他们在最初几周以及评估后第6天的改善程度来预测。虽然总体改善很小,但提示了几个更好预后的基线预测因素:有发作性或复发性发作史、更严重的抑郁症、社会阶层较低、亲密关系破裂作为诱因、中和性生活事件和家庭支持。已婚受试者和有年幼子女的受试者预后较差。