College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P.R. China.
Tumor Hospital of Linzhou City, Linzhou, Henan 456500, P.R. China.
Int J Oncol. 2018 Apr;52(4):1363. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4254. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
An interested reader drew to our attention that, in the above-mentioned article, there were two figures where identity in certain of the data was shared between panels within the same figure. First, in Fig. 3B, the data shown for the EC9706 cell line/negative control (NC) experiment were derived from the same original source as those for the EC-1/Blank control experiment. Secondly, in Fig. 6B the Bcl-2 bands for the two different cell lines, EC9706 and EC-1, were inadvertently duplicated (the data shown for the EC9706 cell line were correct). We have reviewed the original files and the individual figures for the submitted composite figures, and realize that the errors occurred when we produced the composite figures. The same images were accidentally inserted twice in Figs. 3 and 6 without us being fully aware of the error. We have identified all the original images, and the corrected versions of Figs. 3 and 6 are shown opposite. We regret that these errors went unnoticed prior to publication, and thank the Editor for affording us the opportunity to publish this Corrigendum. We also regret any inconvenience caused to the readership of the journal. [the original article was published in the International Journal of Oncology 46: 2163-2171, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2900].
一位感兴趣的读者提请我们注意,在上述文章中,有两个图存在同一图中不同面板的数据存在身份共享的情况。首先,在图 3B 中,EC9706 细胞系/阴性对照(NC)实验所示的数据与 EC-1/空白对照实验来自同一原始来源。其次,在图 6B 中,两个不同细胞系 EC9706 和 EC-1 的 Bcl-2 条带被无意中重复(EC9706 细胞系的数据是正确的)。我们已经检查了提交的组合图的原始文件和各个图,发现错误是在制作组合图时产生的。相同的图像在图 3 和 6 中被意外地插入了两次,而我们没有完全意识到这一错误。我们已经确定了所有原始图像,并且图 3 和 6 的更正版本如图所示。我们对这些错误在发表前未被发现表示遗憾,并感谢编辑为我们提供发表本更正的机会。我们也对期刊的读者造成的任何不便表示歉意。[原始文章发表于《国际肿瘤学杂志》46:2163-2171, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2900]。