• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科护士疼痛知识、评估及记录技能的质量改进计划

Quality Improvement Initiative on Pain Knowledge, Assessment, and Documentation Skills of Pediatric Nurses.

作者信息

Margonary Heather, Hannan Margaret S, Schlenk Elizabeth A

出版信息

Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):65-70.

PMID:29394479
Abstract

Pain treatment begins with a nurse’s assessment, which relies on effective assessment skills. Hospital settings have implemented pain assessment education, but there is limited evidence in pediatric transitional care settings. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to develop, implement, and evaluate an evidence-based pain education session with 20 nurses in a pediatric specialty hospital that provides transitional care. Specific aims were to assess nurses’ knowledge and attitudes of pain, and evaluate assessment skills based on nurses’ documentation. A prospective pre-post design with three assessments (baseline, post-intervention, and one-month follow-up) was used. The Shriner’s Pediatric Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Pain questionnaire and an electronic health record review were completed at each assessment. There was significant improvement in nurses’ knowledge and attitudes of pain after the education session (F[2,6] = 50.281, p < 0.0001) from baseline to post-intervention (p < 0.0001), which was maintained at follow-up (p = 0.009). Pain assessment frequency by nurses significantly increased from 43.1% at baseline to 64.8% at post-intervention, and 67.7% at follow-up (χ²[2] = 20.55, p < 0.0001). Developmentally appropriate pain scale usage increased significantly, from 13.1% at baseline to 77.4% at post-intervention, and 81.8% at follow-up (χ²[2] = 169.19, p < 0.0001). Nursing interventions for pain increased significantly, from 33.3% at baseline to 84.0% at post-intervention, and stabilized at 80.0% at follow-up (χ²[2] = 8.91, p = 0.012). Frequency of pain reassessments did not show a statistically significant change, decreasing from 77.8% at baseline to 44.0% at post-intervention and 40.0% at follow-up (χ²[2]= 3.538, p = 0.171). Nurses’ pain knowledge and documentation of assessment skills were improved in this QI initiative.

摘要

疼痛治疗始于护士的评估,这依赖于有效的评估技能。医院环境中已开展疼痛评估教育,但在儿科过渡护理环境中的相关证据有限。这项质量改进(QI)举措的目的是为一家提供过渡护理的儿科专科医院的20名护士制定、实施并评估一次循证疼痛教育课程。具体目标是评估护士对疼痛的知识和态度,并根据护士的记录评估其评估技能。采用了具有三次评估(基线、干预后和为期一个月的随访)的前瞻性前后对照设计。每次评估时都要完成施赖纳儿科护士关于疼痛的知识和态度问卷以及电子健康记录审查。从基线到干预后,教育课程结束后护士对疼痛的知识和态度有显著改善(F[2,6]=50.281,p<0.0001)(p<0.0001),在随访时保持这一改善(p=0.009)。护士进行疼痛评估的频率从基线时的43.1%显著增加到干预后的64.8%,随访时为67.7%(χ²[2]=20.55,p<0.0001)。适合不同发育阶段的疼痛量表使用显著增加,从基线时的13.1%增加到干预后的77.4%,随访时为81.8%(χ²[2]=169.19,p<0.0001)。针对疼痛的护理干预显著增加,从基线时的33.3%增加到干预后的84.0%,随访时稳定在80.0%(χ²[2]=8.91,p=0.012)。疼痛重新评估的频率没有显示出统计学上的显著变化,从基线时的77.8%降至干预后的44.0%,随访时为40.0%(χ²[2]=3.538,p=0.171)。在这项质量改进举措中,护士的疼痛知识和评估技能记录得到了改善。

相似文献

1
Quality Improvement Initiative on Pain Knowledge, Assessment, and Documentation Skills of Pediatric Nurses.儿科护士疼痛知识、评估及记录技能的质量改进计划
Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):65-70.
2
Pain Management Practices in a Pediatric Emergency Room (PAMPER) Study: interventions with nurses.儿科急诊室疼痛管理实践(PAMPER)研究:护士干预措施
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Aug;25(8):498-503. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0af.
3
Optimal Pain Assessment in Pediatric Rehabilitation: Implementation of a Nursing Guideline.儿科康复中的最佳疼痛评估:护理指南的实施
Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Dec;16(6):871-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
4
Effects of a pain education program on nurses' pain knowledge, attitudes and pain assessment practices in China.疼痛教育项目对中国护士疼痛知识、态度及疼痛评估实践的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Dec;36(6):616-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.020. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
5
Knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain in Mongolian nurses.蒙古护士对小儿疼痛的认知与态度。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Jun;16(3):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
6
An Educational Intervention to Improve Nurses' Understanding of Pain in Children in Western India.一项旨在提高印度西部护士对儿童疼痛理解的教育干预措施。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2017 Feb;18(1):24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
7
Education changes Mexican nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain.教育改变了墨西哥护士对小儿疼痛的认知和态度。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2010 Dec;11(4):201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2009.11.001.
8
Can A Complex Online Intervention Improve Cancer Nurses' Pain Screening and Assessment Practices? Results from a Multicenter, Pre-post Test Pilot Study.一项复杂的在线干预能否改善癌症护士的疼痛筛查与评估实践?一项多中心前后测试试点研究的结果。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2017 Apr;18(2):75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.01.003.
9
Pediatric Pain Management: An Evidence-Based Approach.儿科疼痛管理:基于证据的方法。
Pediatr Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):39-46, 49.
10
Knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management of pediatric nurses in Turkey.土耳其儿科护士对疼痛管理的知识与态度。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Dec;14(4):e262-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Documentation of Pain Reassessment after Pain Management Interventions in the NICU.改善新生儿重症监护病房疼痛管理干预后疼痛重新评估的记录
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2023 Sep 28;8(5):e688. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000688. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
2
Knowledge and attitude towards pediatric pain management among nurses at Ethiopian tertiary hospitals; a multi-center study.埃塞俄比亚三级医院护士对小儿疼痛管理的知识与态度;一项多中心研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 27;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01234-8.
3
Mapping research findings on change implementation in nursing practice: A scoping literature review.
绘制护理实践中变革实施研究结果的图谱:一项范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):450-468. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1369. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Strategies to Improve Compliance with Clinical Nursing Documentation Guidelines in the Acute Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review and Analysis.提高急症医院临床护理文件书写指南依从性的策略:系统评价与分析
SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Feb 14;8:23779608221075165. doi: 10.1177/23779608221075165. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.