Le May Sylvie, Johnston C Celeste, Choinière Manon, Fortin Christophe, Kudirka Denise, Murray Louise, Chalut Dominic
Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QuebecH3C 3J7, Canada.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Aug;25(8):498-503. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181b0a0af.
Children's pain in emergency departments (EDs) is poorly managed by nurses, despite evidence that pain is one of the most commonly presenting complaints of children attending the ED. Our objectives were 2-fold: to verify if tailored educational interventions with emergency pediatric nurses would improve nurses' knowledge of pain management and nurses' pain management practices (documentation of pain, administration of analgesics, nonpharmacological interventions).
This intervention study with a pre-post design (baseline, immediately after the intervention [T-2], and 6 months after intervention [T-3]) used a sample of nurses (N = 50) and retrospective chart reviews of children (N = 450; 150 charts reviewed each at baseline, T-2, and T-3) who presented themselves in the ED with a diagnosis known to generate moderate to severe pain (burns, acute abdominal pain, deep lacerations, fracture, sprain). Principal outcomes: nurses' knowledge of pain management (Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Survey [PNKAS] on pain) and nurses' clinical practices of pain management (Pain Management Experience Evaluation [PMEE]).
Response rate on the PNKAS was 84% (42/50) at baseline and 50% (21/42) at T-2. Mean scores on PNKAS were 28.2 (SD, 4.9; max, 42.0) at baseline and 31.0 (SD, 4.6) at T-2. Results from paired t test showed significant difference between both times (t = -3.129, P = 0.005). Nurses who participated in the capsules improved their documentation of pain from baseline (59.3%) to T-2 (80.8%; chi = 12.993, P < 0.001) as well as from baseline (59.3%) to T-3 (89.1%; chi = 29.436, P < 0.001). In addition, nurses increased their nonpharmacological interventions from baseline (16.7%) to T-3 (31.9%; chi = 8.623, P = 0.003). Finally, we obtained significant differences on pain documentation between the group of nurses who attended at least 1 capsule and the group of nurses who did not attend any capsule at both times (T-2 and T-3; chi = 20.424, P < 0.001; chi = 33.333, P < 0.001, respectively).
The interventions contributed to the improvement of the nurses' knowledge of pain management and some of the practices over time. We believe that an intervention tailored to nurses' needs and schedule has more impact than just passive diffusion of educational content.
尽管有证据表明疼痛是急诊部门就诊儿童最常见的主诉之一,但护士对急诊部门儿童疼痛的管理仍不到位。我们的目标有两个:验证针对急诊儿科护士的定制化教育干预措施是否能提高护士对疼痛管理的知识以及护士的疼痛管理实践(疼痛记录、镇痛药给药、非药物干预)。
这项采用前后设计(基线、干预后即刻[T - 2]以及干预后6个月[T - 3])的干预研究,选取了护士样本(N = 50),并对在急诊部门就诊且诊断为会产生中度至重度疼痛(烧伤、急性腹痛、深度撕裂伤、骨折、扭伤)的儿童进行回顾性病历审查(N = 450;基线、T - 2和T - 3时各审查150份病历)。主要结局指标:护士对疼痛管理的知识(关于疼痛的儿科护士知识与态度调查[PNKAS])以及护士的疼痛管理临床实践(疼痛管理经验评估[PMEE])。
PNKAS的基线应答率为84%(42/50),T - 2时为50%(21/42)。PNKAS的平均得分在基线时为28.2(标准差,4.9;满分,42.0),T - 2时为31.0(标准差,4.6)。配对t检验结果显示两次得分之间存在显著差异(t = -3.129,P = 0.005)。参与培训的护士将疼痛记录从基线时的59.3%提高到了T - 2时的80.8%(卡方 = 12.993,P < 0.001),以及从基线时的59.3%提高到了T - 3时的89.1%(卡方 = 29.436,P < 0.001)。此外,护士的非药物干预从基线时的16.7%增加到了T - 3时的31.9%(卡方 = 8.623,P = 0.003)。最后,在T - 2和T - 3这两个时间点,至少参加1次培训的护士组与未参加任何培训的护士组在疼痛记录方面均存在显著差异(卡方分别为20.424,P < 0.001;卡方为33.333,P < 0.001)。
随着时间的推移,这些干预措施有助于提高护士对疼痛管理的知识以及一些实践水平。我们认为,根据护士的需求和日程安排定制的干预措施比单纯被动传播教育内容更有影响力。