Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):444-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Diagnostic methods to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer have not been established. Dedicated breast PET (DbPET) is a high-resolution molecular breast imaging method, and we investigated the capability of DbPET to predict residual primary tumors after NAC compared with whole-body PET (WBPET).
Forty-five patients (47 tumors) underwent WBPET and ring-type DbPET after NAC, and the tumors were completely resected between January 2016 and March 2017. The pathological response was classified as complete remission (ypT0), residual intraductal disease (ypTis), or residual invasive disease (ypT ≥ 1). Standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR) were assessed.
Twelve patients achieved ypT0 and five developed ypTis. DbPET detected all cases of ypTis, and WBPET detected only one case of ypTis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of WBPET for ypTis and/or ypT ≥ 1 were 54.3%, 83.3%, and 61.7%, respectively, and those of DbPET were 77.1%, 83.3%, and 78.7%, respectively. In the ypT0/ypTis/ypT ≥ 1 groups, the median WBPET-SUV, DbPET-SUV, and DbPET-TNR was 1.0/0.9/1.1, 1.7/1.8/2.2, and 1.0/1.6/1.7 (P = .134, .077, and 0.008), respectively. Areas under the curves of WBPET-SUV, DbPET-SUV, and DbPET-TNR for predicting ypTis and/or ypT ≥ 1 were 0.610, 0.648, and 0.807, respectively.
DbPET was more accurate than WBPET in detecting residual primary tumors after NAC, particularly intraductal carcinoma. TNR was the better parameter for pathological evaluation compared with SUV.
用于评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)反应的诊断方法尚未建立。专用乳腺 PET(DbPET)是一种高分辨率的分子乳腺成像方法,我们研究了 DbPET 预测 NAC 后残留原发性肿瘤的能力,并与全身 PET(WBPET)进行了比较。
45 名患者(47 个肿瘤)在 NAC 后接受了 WBPET 和环形 DbPET 检查,并于 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月之间完全切除了肿瘤。病理反应分为完全缓解(ypT0)、残留管内疾病(ypTis)或残留浸润性疾病(ypT≥1)。评估标准化摄取值(SUV)和肿瘤与正常组织比值(TNR)。
12 名患者达到了 ypT0,5 名患者出现了 ypTis。DbPET 检测到所有 ypTis 病例,而 WBPET 仅检测到 1 例 ypTis。WBPET 检测 ypTis 和/或 ypT≥1 的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 54.3%、83.3%和 61.7%,DbPET 分别为 77.1%、83.3%和 78.7%。在 ypT0/ypTis/ypT≥1 组中,WBPET-SUV、DbPET-SUV 和 DbPET-TNR 的中位数分别为 1.0/0.9/1.1、1.7/1.8/2.2 和 1.0/1.6/1.7(P=0.134、0.077 和 0.008)。WBPET-SUV、DbPET-SUV 和 DbPET-TNR 预测 ypTis 和/或 ypT≥1 的曲线下面积分别为 0.610、0.648 和 0.807。
DbPET 比 WBPET 更能准确地检测 NAC 后残留的原发性肿瘤,尤其是管内癌。与 SUV 相比,TNR 是评估病理更优的参数。