• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

New perspectives to improve critical care benchmarking.

作者信息

Salluh Jorge I F, Chiche Jean Daniel, Reis Carlos Eduardo, Soares Marcio

机构信息

Department of Critical Care and Graduate Program in Translational Medicine, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30 - 3° andar, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 22281-100, Brazil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Feb 2;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0363-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13613-018-0363-0
PMID:29396755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5796917/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d4/5796917/ac4b4c93a454/13613_2018_363_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d4/5796917/ac4b4c93a454/13613_2018_363_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36d4/5796917/ac4b4c93a454/13613_2018_363_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
New perspectives to improve critical care benchmarking.改善重症监护基准的新视角。
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Feb 2;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0363-0.
2
Review of the acuity scoring systems for the pediatric intensive care unit and their use in quality improvement.儿科重症监护病房的 acuity 评分系统综述及其在质量改进中的应用。
J Intensive Care Med. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):131-40. doi: 10.1177/0885066607299492.
3
Rating the quality of intensive care units: is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?评估重症监护病房的质量：这是重症监护病房评分系统的一项功能吗？
Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):1976-82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00005.
4
Benchmarking, public reporting, and pay-for-performance: a mixed-methods survey of California pediatric intensive care unit medical directors.基准测试、公开报告和按绩效付费：对加利福尼亚州儿科重症监护病房医疗主任的混合方法调查。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;12(6):e225-32. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181fe2e26.
5
Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的疾病严重程度评分系统。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f96f81.
6
External benchmarking of trauma services in New South Wales: Risk-adjusted mortality after moderate to severe injury from 2012 to 2016.新南威尔士州创伤服务的外部基准评估：2012年至2016年中度至重度损伤后的风险调整死亡率。
Injury. 2019 Jan;50(1):178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.037. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
7
Why try to predict ICU outcomes?为什么要尝试预测重症监护病房的治疗结果？
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):544-9. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000136.
8
Benchmarking care for very low birthweight infants in Ireland and Northern Ireland.爱尔兰和北爱尔兰极低出生体重儿护理的基准测试。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Jan;95(1):F30-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.160002. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
9
Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.欧洲与绩效指标和基准相关的卫生服务研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:38-47. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011042.
10
The use of indicators to improve the quality of intensive care: theoretical aspects and experiences from the Dutch intensive care registry.使用指标来提高重症监护质量：荷兰重症监护登记处的理论方面和经验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Oct;56(9):1084-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02687.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2022: 100,000 Survivors.体外生命支持组织注册国际报告 2022：10 万名幸存者。
ASAIO J. 2024 Feb 1;70(2):131-143. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002128. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
Mixed methods study protocol for combining stakeholder-led rapid evaluation with near real-time continuous registry data to facilitate evaluations of quality of care in intensive care units.混合方法研究方案：将利益相关者主导的快速评估与近实时连续登记数据相结合，以促进重症监护病房护理质量评估。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Nov 1;8:29. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18710.3. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Small steps beyond benchmarking.超越基准的小步骤。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Apr-Jun;29(2):128-130. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170022.
2
Centralized patient-reported outcome data collection in transplantation is feasible and clinically meaningful.移植中集中式患者报告结局数据收集是可行的且具有临床意义。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;123(23):4687-4700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30936. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Identifying Distinct Subgroups of ICU Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.识别重症监护病房患者的不同亚组：一种机器学习方法。
What intensive care registries can teach us about outcomes.
重症监护注册研究可以告诉我们哪些结局信息。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Oct 1;27(5):537-543. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000865.
4
The future development of intensive care quality indicators - a methods paper.重症监护质量指标的未来发展——方法研究论文。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Oct 30;18:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/000285. eCollection 2020.
5
Development and validation of delirium prediction model for critically ill adults parameterized to ICU admission acuity.开发和验证针对 ICU 入院严重程度参数化的危重症成人谵妄预测模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237639. eCollection 2020.
6
How to evaluate intensive care unit performance during the COVID-19 pandemic.如何评估新冠疫情期间重症监护病房的绩效。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Jun;32(2):203-206. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200040. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Rationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: a narrative review.在 ICU 中合理使用抗菌治疗：一篇叙述性综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Feb;45(2):172-189. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05520-5. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1607-1615. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002548.
4
Understanding intensive care unit benchmarking.理解重症监护病房基准评估。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1703-1707. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4760-x. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
The effects of performance status one week before hospital admission on the outcomes of critically ill patients.入院前一周的体能状态对重症患者结局的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):39-47. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4563-5. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
6
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Subphenotypes Respond Differently to Randomized Fluid Management Strategy.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的亚型对随机液体管理策略反应不同。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 1;195(3):331-338. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0645OC.
7
Fusing Randomized Trials With Big Data: The Key to Self-learning Health Care Systems?将随机试验与大数据融合：自我学习医疗保健系统的关键？
JAMA. 2015 Aug 25;314(8):767-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7762.
8
The platform trial: an efficient strategy for evaluating multiple treatments.平台试验：一种评估多种治疗方法的有效策略。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1619-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2316.
9
Using existing data to address important clinical questions in critical care.利用现有数据解决重症监护中的重要临床问题。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):886-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827bfc3c.
10
The present use of quality indicators in the intensive care unit.目前在重症监护病房中使用的质量指标。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Oct;56(9):1078-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02656.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.