• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准化三维计算机断层扫描扫描仪重建提高了髋臼骨折分类的准确性。

Standardized three dimensional computerised tomography scanner reconstructions increase the accuracy of acetabular fracture classification.

作者信息

Sebaaly Amer, Riouallon Guillaume, Zaraa Mourad, Upex Peter, Marteau Véronique, Jouffroy Pomme

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.

School of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1957-1965. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3810-5. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-018-3810-5
PMID:29396805
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluate the role of four standardized 3D reconstruction views in the accurate diagnosis of acetabular fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five acetabular fracture cases were selected from a tertiary centre database. Fourteen reviewers with different experience level evaluated this set of images which were provided in axial 2D views and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) without 3D views in the first two readings then the standardized 3D views were added for the subsequent two readings. The primary outcome was the accuracy of diagnosis while inter-observer reliability and reading time as well as time needed for accurate diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

Accuracy of classification was 56.7% using the 2D and 73% using the described 3D (p < 0.001). Improvement was noted in all groups even though the expert group showed the least improvement (6.7% (p = 0.04)) and the least experience group showed the most improvement (35.7% (p < 0.001)). Average time of interpretation was 96 minutes for the 2D sets and 47 minutes for the 3D sets. Finally, the adding of the four standardized views increased the inter-observer reliability in all groups compared to the standard 2D sets with MPR.

CONCLUSION

Acetabular fracture diagnosis according to Letournel classification is difficult and depends greatly on the experience of the reader. The described set of 3D images yields better accuracy and renders the diagnosis more repeatable and faster. We recommend the use of these images in classifying acetabular fractures.

摘要

目的

评估四种标准化三维重建视图在髋臼骨折准确诊断中的作用。

材料与方法

从一家三级中心数据库中选取35例髋臼骨折病例。14名经验水平不同的阅片者对这组图像进行评估,在前两轮阅片中提供的是轴向二维视图和多平面重建(MPR)图像,无三维视图,随后两轮阅片时添加了标准化三维视图。主要结果是诊断的准确性,同时评估观察者间的可靠性、阅片时间以及准确诊断所需时间。

结果

使用二维图像时分类准确率为56.7%,使用所述三维图像时为73%(p<0.001)。所有组均有改善,尽管专家组改善最少(6.7%(p=0.04)),经验最少的组改善最多(35.7%(p<0.001))。二维图像集的平均解读时间为96分钟,三维图像集为47分钟。最后,与带有MPR的标准二维图像集相比,添加这四种标准化视图提高了所有组观察者间的可靠性。

结论

根据Letournel分类法诊断髋臼骨折较为困难,很大程度上取决于阅片者的经验。所述的三维图像集具有更高的准确性,使诊断更具可重复性且速度更快。我们建议使用这些图像对髋臼骨折进行分类。

相似文献

1
Standardized three dimensional computerised tomography scanner reconstructions increase the accuracy of acetabular fracture classification.标准化三维计算机断层扫描扫描仪重建提高了髋臼骨折分类的准确性。
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1957-1965. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3810-5. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures.三维和二维计算机断层扫描在髋臼骨折分类中的比较。
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Apr;27(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01744-6. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?多排螺旋CT用于髋臼骨折的Letournel分类的观察者间一致性:标准Judet位X线片是否必要?
Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):386-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412050960. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
4
Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.髋臼骨折 Judet 位投照准确性评估与三维计算机断层扫描比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03441-9.
5
Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?四个不同骨盆创伤中心的髋臼骨折评估:Judet位片是否已变得多余?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jul;135(7):913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2223-9. Epub 2015 May 1.
6
Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.髋臼骨折的Letournel分类。观察者间及观察者内可靠性评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1704-9.
7
A New, Easy, Fast, and Reliable Method to Correctly Classify Acetabular Fractures According to the Letournel System.一种根据勒图尔内尔系统正确分类髋臼骨折的全新、简便、快速且可靠的方法。
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Feb 16;3(1):e0032. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00032. eCollection 2018 Mar 29.
8
How to improve the performance of acetabulum fracture diagnoses: investigating the use of three-dimensional CT-scan reconstructions.如何提高髋臼骨折诊断的性能:研究三维 CT 扫描重建的应用。
Emerg Radiol. 2022 Oct;29(5):863-871. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02068-8. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
9
[CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing].基于CT的髋臼骨折分类辅助:评估与临床测试
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Nov;116(11):1006-14. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2494-y.
10
Value of 3D fluoroscopic imaging of acetabular fractures comparison to 2D fluoroscopy and CT imaging.髋臼骨折三维透视成像与二维透视及CT成像对比的价值
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Jun;128(6):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0411-y. Epub 2007 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Algorithms in acetabular fracture classifications.髋臼骨折分类中的算法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct;144(10):4655-4665. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05599-6. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
The Novel Impact of Augmented Reality and 3D Printing in the Diagnosis of Complex Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Randomized Study in Orthopedic Residents.增强现实和3D打印在复杂髋臼骨折诊断中的新影响:一项针对骨科住院医师的比较随机研究
J Clin Med. 2024 May 23;13(11):3059. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113059.
3
One-stop computerized virtual planning system for the surgical management of posterior wall acetabular fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved acetabular fracture diagnosis after training in a CT-based method.在基于CT的方法培训后,髋臼骨折诊断得到改善。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 May;103(3):325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
The ongoing relevance of acetabular fracture classification.髋臼骨折分类的持续相关性。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1139-43. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.33653.
3
Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?四个不同骨盆创伤中心的髋臼骨折评估:Judet位片是否已变得多余?
一站式计算机化虚拟规划系统,用于髋臼后柱骨折的外科治疗。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Oct 4;17(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03333-9.
4
Will technology drive orthopaedic surgery in the future?未来科技会推动骨科手术发展吗?
Int Orthop. 2022 Jul;46(7):1443-1445. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05454-6.
5
Three-dimensional mapping study of pure transverse acetabular fractures.纯横向髋臼骨折的三维测绘研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 13;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03148-8.
6
Application of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures surgery.计算机化虚拟术前规划程序在粉碎性髋臼后柱骨折手术中的应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 29;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02937-5.
7
Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Applications in Traumatic Fractures.创伤性骨折中3D打印应用的Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 31;8:696391. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.696391. eCollection 2021.
8
What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?髋臼骨折中间隙和台阶测量的观察者间及观察者内变异性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Dec;478(12):2801-2808. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001398.
9
Traditional three-dimensional printing technology versus three-dimensional printing mirror model technology in the treatment of isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective analysis.传统三维打印技术与三维打印镜像模型技术治疗孤立性髋臼骨折的回顾性分析。
J Int Med Res. 2020 May;48(5):300060520924250. doi: 10.1177/0300060520924250.
10
Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures.三维和二维计算机断层扫描在髋臼骨折分类中的比较。
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Apr;27(2):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01744-6. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jul;135(7):913-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2223-9. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Acetabular fractures: what radiologists should know and how 3D CT can aid classification.髋臼骨折:放射科医生应该了解的知识以及 3D CT 如何辅助分类。
Radiographics. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):555-77. doi: 10.1148/rg.352140098.
5
CT-generated radiographs in obese patients with acetabular fractures: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?肥胖髋臼骨折患者的CT生成X线片:能否替代平片?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3362-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3697-4.
6
Comprehension and reproducibility of the Judet and Letournel classification.朱代(Judet)和勒图尔内尔(Letournel)分类法的理解与可重复性。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(2):70-4. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000200002.
7
Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures.简要分类:髋臼骨折的勒图尔内尔分类法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):35-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3375-y. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
8
[CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing].基于CT的髋臼骨折分类辅助:评估与临床测试
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Nov;116(11):1006-14. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2494-y.
9
Value of 3-D CT in classifying acetabular fractures during orthopedic residency training.三维CT在骨科住院医师培训期间髋臼骨折分类中的价值
Orthopedics. 2012 May;35(5):e615-20. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120426-12.
10
Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures.评价 CT 扫描在髋臼骨折诊断中的应用。
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):284-90. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0.