• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朱代(Judet)和勒图尔内尔(Letournel)分类法的理解与可重复性。

Comprehension and reproducibility of the Judet and Letournel classification.

作者信息

Polesello Giancarlo Cavalli, Nunes Marcus Aurelius Araujo, Azuaga Thiago Leonardi, de Queiroz Marcelo Cavalheiro, Honda Emerson Kyoshi, Ono Nelson Keiske

机构信息

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo - FCMSCSP - São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(2):70-4. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000200002.

DOI:10.1590/S1413-78522012000200002
PMID:24453583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3718428/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the method of radiographic interpretation of acetabular fractures, according to the classification of Judet and Letournel, used by a group of residents of Orthopedics at a university hospital.

METHODS

We selected ten orthopedic residents, who were divided into two groups; one group received training in a methodology for the classification of acetabular fractures, which involves transposing the radiographic images to a graphic two-dimensional representation. We classified fifty cases of acetabular fracture on two separate occasions, and determined the intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

RESULT

The success rate was 16.2% (10-26%) for the trained group and 22.8% (10-36%) for the untrained group. The mean kappa coefficients for interobserver and intraobserver agreement in the trained group were 0.08 and 0.12, respectively, and for the untrained group, 0.14 and 0.29.

CONCLUSION

Training in the method of radiographic interpretation of acetabular fractures was not effective for assisting in the classification of acetabular fractures. Level of evidence I, Testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria on consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).

摘要

目的

根据Judet和Letournel分类法,评估某大学医院一组骨科住院医师使用的髋臼骨折影像学解读方法的有效性。

方法

我们选取了10名骨科住院医师,将其分为两组;一组接受了髋臼骨折分类方法的培训,该方法涉及将影像学图像转换为二维图形表示。我们在两个不同的时间对50例髋臼骨折病例进行分类,并确定观察者内和观察者间的一致性。

结果

训练组的成功率为16.2%(10 - 26%),未训练组的成功率为22.8%(10 - 36%)。训练组观察者间和观察者内一致性的平均kappa系数分别为0.08和0.12,未训练组分别为0.14和0.29。

结论

髋臼骨折影像学解读方法的培训对辅助髋臼骨折分类无效。证据等级I,对连续患者应用先前制定的诊断标准进行测试(采用普遍适用的参考“金标准”)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/50ce40c281cf/aob-20-070-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/acab4f43b8d0/aob-20-070-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/8cc0dbea6efd/aob-20-070-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/958f14a16487/aob-20-070-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/f963020196ce/aob-20-070-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/8961f49f5e30/aob-20-070-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/50ce40c281cf/aob-20-070-g06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/acab4f43b8d0/aob-20-070-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/8cc0dbea6efd/aob-20-070-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/958f14a16487/aob-20-070-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/f963020196ce/aob-20-070-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/8961f49f5e30/aob-20-070-g05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df1/3718428/50ce40c281cf/aob-20-070-g06.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehension and reproducibility of the Judet and Letournel classification.朱代(Judet)和勒图尔内尔(Letournel)分类法的理解与可重复性。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(2):70-4. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000200002.
2
Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment.三柱分型在髋臼骨折中的应用:介绍与可重复性评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Nov 20;101(22):2015-2025. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00284.
3
Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models.使用三维打印实体模型的Letournel髋臼骨折分类系统的观察者间和观察者内一致性
World J Orthop. 2021 Feb 18;12(2):82-93. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i2.82.
4
ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION.勒图尔内尔和朱代分类法的观察者间可靠性评估
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Mar 22;32(1):e267640. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243201e267640. eCollection 2024.
5
Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?多排螺旋CT用于髋臼骨折的Letournel分类的观察者间一致性:标准Judet位X线片是否必要?
Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):386-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412050960. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
6
Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.提高髋臼骨折分类的可靠性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Jun;123(5):228-33. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0507-y. Epub 2003 Apr 26.
7
Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.髋臼骨折的Letournel分类。观察者间及观察者内可靠性评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1704-9.
8
Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.髋臼骨折 Judet 位投照准确性评估与三维计算机断层扫描比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03441-9.
9
There Is No Column: A New Classification for Acetabular Fractures.无柱分类:髋臼骨折的一种新分类。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 17;100(2):e8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00600.
10
What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?3D虚拟现实技术在理解髋臼骨折方面有何价值?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jan;30(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02537-w. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the Reliability and Accuracy of the Judet and Letournel Classification System for Acetabular Fractures Increase using a Novel Algorithm?使用一种新算法是否会提高髋臼骨折Judet和Letournel分类系统的可靠性和准确性?
Malays Orthop J. 2025 Jul;19(2):57-65. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2507.008.
2
Algorithms in acetabular fracture classifications.髋臼骨折分类中的算法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct;144(10):4655-4665. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05599-6. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
3D PRINTING IN COMPLEX TIBIAL FRACTURE CLASSIFICATION & PLANNING.

本文引用的文献

1
Proposed guidelines for increasing the reliability and validity of Letournel classification system.提出提高 Letournel 分类系统可靠性和有效性的指南。
Injury. 2009 Oct;40(10):1098-103. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
2
FRACTURES OF THE ACETABULUM: CLASSIFICATION AND SURGICAL APPROACHES FOR OPEN REDUCTION. PRELIMINARY REPORT.髋臼骨折:切开复位的分类及手术入路。初步报告。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Dec;46:1615-46.
3
Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
3D打印在复杂胫骨骨折分类与规划中的应用
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Aug 2;32(3):e269705. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243203e269705. eCollection 2024.
4
Quadrilateral plate classification program of acetabular fractures based on three-column classification: a three-dimensional fracture mapping study.基于三柱分类的髋臼骨折四边形板分类方案:三维骨折图谱研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 16;19(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04783-z.
5
Unclassified acetabular fractures: Do they really exist?未分类的髋臼骨折:它们真的存在吗?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2397-2405. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03908-8. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
6
ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION.勒图尔内尔和朱代分类法的观察者间可靠性评估
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024 Mar 22;32(1):e267640. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220243201e267640. eCollection 2024.
7
Algorithm Improves Acetabular Fracture Radiograph Interpretation Among Inexperienced Practitioners.算法改善了经验不足的从业者对髋臼骨折X光片的解读。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 21;14(1):e21471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21471. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Epidemiological assessment of acetabular fractures in a level one trauma centre: A 7-Year observational study.一级创伤中心髋臼骨折的流行病学评估:一项7年的观察性研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Nov-Dec;11(6):1104-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?髋臼骨折中间隙和台阶测量的观察者间及观察者内变异性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Dec;478(12):2801-2808. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001398.
10
Standardized three dimensional computerised tomography scanner reconstructions increase the accuracy of acetabular fracture classification.标准化三维计算机断层扫描扫描仪重建提高了髋臼骨折分类的准确性。
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1957-1965. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3810-5. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
髋臼骨折的Letournel分类。观察者间及观察者内可靠性评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85(9):1704-9.
4
Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.提高髋臼骨折分类的可靠性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Jun;123(5):228-33. doi: 10.1007/s00402-003-0507-y. Epub 2003 Apr 26.
5
Evaluation of Letournel and Judet classification of acetabular fracture with plain radiographs and three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan.运用X线平片及三维计算机断层扫描评估髋臼骨折的Letournel和Judet分类法
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2000 Jun;8(1):33-37. doi: 10.1177/230949900000800107.
6
[The value of CT in classification and decision making in acetabulum fractures. A systematic analysis].[CT在髋臼骨折分类及决策中的价值。一项系统分析]
Unfallchirurg. 1999 Feb;102(2):124-31. doi: 10.1007/s001130050383.
7
Acetabulum fractures: classification and management.髋臼骨折:分类与治疗
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Sep(151):81-106.
8
Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study.髋臼骨折。一项前瞻性研究的早期结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Apr(205):241-50.
9
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.