Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Addiction. 2018 Jul;113(7):1188-1209. doi: 10.1111/add.14180. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
To review systematically the published literature on extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX, Vivitrol ), marketed as a once-per-month injection product to treat opioid use disorder. We addressed the following questions: (1) how successful is induction on XR-NTX; (2) what are adherence rates to XR-NTX; and (3) does XR-NTX decrease opioid use? Factors associated with these outcomes as well as overdose rates were examined.
We searched PubMed and used Google Scholar for forward citation searches of peer-reviewed papers from January 2006 to June 2017. Studies that included individuals seeking treatment for opioid use disorder who were offered XR-NTX were included.
We identified and included 34 studies. Pooled estimates showed that XR-NTX induction success was lower in studies that included individuals that required opioid detoxification [62.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 54.5-70.0%] compared with studies that included individuals already detoxified from opioids (85.0%, 95% CI = 78.0-90.1%); 44.2% (95% CI = 33.1-55.9%) of individuals took all scheduled injections of XR-NTX, which were usually six or fewer. Adherence was higher in prospective investigational studies (i.e. studies conducted in a research context according to a study protocol) compared to retrospective studies of medical records taken from routine care (6-month rates: 46.7%, 95% CI = 34.5-59.2% versus 10.5%, 95% CI = 4.6-22.4%, respectively). Compared with referral to treatment, XR-NTX reduced opioid use in adults under criminal justice supervision and when administered to inmates before release. XR-NTX reduced opioid use compared with placebo in Russian adults, but this effect was confounded by differential retention between study groups. XR-NTX showed similar efficacy to buprenorphine when randomization occurred after detoxification, but was inferior to buprenorphine when randomization occurred prior to detoxification.
Many individuals intending to start extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) do not and most who do start XR-NTX discontinue treatment prematurely, two factors that limit its clinical utility significantly. XR-NTX appears to decrease opioid use but there are few experimental demonstrations of this effect.
系统回顾已发表的关于纳曲酮长效制剂(XR-NTX,Vivitrol)的文献,该药物为每月注射一次的产品,用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。我们提出了以下问题:(1)诱导 XR-NTX 治疗的成功率是多少;(2)XR-NTX 的依从率是多少;(3)XR-NTX 是否能减少阿片类药物的使用?还检查了与这些结果相关的因素以及过量用药的发生率。
我们检索了 PubMed 数据库,并使用 Google Scholar 对 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月发表的同行评议文献进行了前瞻性引用检索。纳入了接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗并接受 XR-NTX 治疗的个体的研究。
我们确定并纳入了 34 项研究。汇总估计显示,在纳入需要阿片类药物解毒的个体的研究中,XR-NTX 诱导成功率较低[62.6%,95%置信区间(CI)=54.5-70.0%],而在纳入已从阿片类药物中解毒的个体的研究中,成功率较高[85.0%,95%CI=78.0-90.1%];44.2%(95%CI=33.1-55.9%)的个体接受了所有计划的 XR-NTX 注射,通常为 6 次或更少。前瞻性研究(即根据研究方案在研究环境中进行的研究)的依从性高于从常规治疗中获取医疗记录的回顾性研究(6 个月的依从率:46.7%,95%CI=34.5-59.2%与 10.5%,95%CI=4.6-22.4%)。与转介治疗相比,XR-NTX 减少了在刑事司法监管下的成年人以及在囚犯释放前使用阿片类药物的情况。XR-NTX 与安慰剂相比减少了俄罗斯成年人的阿片类药物使用,但这种效果受到研究组之间的差异保留的影响。XR-NTX 在解毒后随机分组时与丁丙诺啡的疗效相似,但在解毒前随机分组时则劣于丁丙诺啡。
许多打算开始使用纳曲酮长效制剂(XR-NTX)的个体并未开始治疗,而大多数开始治疗的个体也提前停止了治疗,这两个因素极大地限制了其临床应用。XR-NTX 似乎减少了阿片类药物的使用,但很少有实验证明这种效果。