• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

程序性镇静治疗结局追踪与报告(TROOPS):来自国际推进程序性镇静质量改进和研究联合会的标准化质量改进和研究工具。

Tracking and Reporting Outcomes Of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS): Standardized Quality Improvement and Research Tools from the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation.

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.004
PMID:29397125
Abstract

Many hospitals, and medical and dental clinics and offices, routinely monitor their procedural-sedation practices-tracking adverse events, outcomes, and efficacy in order to optimize the sedation delivery and practice. Currently, there exist substantial differences between settings in the content, collection, definition, and interpretation of such sedation outcomes, with resulting widespread reporting variation. With the objective of reducing such disparities, the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation has herein developed a multidisciplinary, consensus-based, standardized tool intended to be applicable for all types of sedation providers in all locations worldwide. This tool is amenable for inclusion in either a paper or an electronic medical record. An additional, parallel research tool is presented to promote consistency and standardized data collection for procedural-sedation investigations.

摘要

许多医院、医疗和牙科诊所及诊室通常会监测其程序镇静实践情况,以跟踪不良事件、结果和疗效,从而优化镇静实施和实践。目前,不同环境之间在镇静结果的内容、收集、定义和解释方面存在很大差异,导致报告存在广泛差异。为了减少这种差异,推进程序镇静的国际委员会在此制定了一种多学科、基于共识的标准化工具,旨在适用于全球所有类型的镇静提供者。该工具可用于纸质或电子病历。还提出了另一个平行的研究工具,以促进程序镇静研究的一致性和标准化数据收集。

相似文献

1
Tracking and Reporting Outcomes Of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS): Standardized Quality Improvement and Research Tools from the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation.程序性镇静治疗结局追踪与报告(TROOPS):来自国际推进程序性镇静质量改进和研究联合会的标准化质量改进和研究工具。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
2
Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: a consensus document from the World SIVA International Sedation Task Force.不良事件报告工具,用于规范程序镇静期间不良事件的报告和跟踪:来自世界 SIVA 国际镇静工作组的共识文件。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108(1):13-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer407.
3
An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on fasting before procedural sedation in adults and children.成人和儿童在程序镇静前禁食的国际多学科共识声明。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Mar;75(3):374-385. doi: 10.1111/anae.14892. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Consensus-based recommendations for standardizing terminology and reporting adverse events for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children.关于标准化儿童急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛术语及报告不良事件的基于共识的建议。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):426-435.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.030. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
5
Unscheduled Procedural Sedation: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Practice Guideline.非计划性程序镇静:多学科共识实践指南。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):e51-e65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.02.022.
6
Conscious sedation guidance.清醒镇静指南。
Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(4):90-1. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400441.
7
Intercollegiate Advisory Committee for Sedation in Dentistry: Review of the Guidelines Published in April 2015.牙科镇静跨校咨询委员会:2015年4月发布指南的回顾
Dent Update. 2015 Oct;42(8):704-6, 708. doi: 10.12968/denu.2015.42.8.704.
8
Current State of Institutional Privileging Profiles for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Providers.儿科程序性镇静提供者机构特权配置文件的现状
Hosp Pediatr. 2015 Sep;5(9):487-94. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2015-0052.
9
Development and validation of the PROcedural Sedation Assessment Survey (PROSAS) for assessment of procedural sedation quality.用于评估程序性镇静质量的程序性镇静评估调查(PROSAS)的开发与验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):194-203.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.062. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
10
Utility of Procedural Sedation as a Marker for Quality Assurance in Emergency Medicine.程序性镇静在急诊医学质量保证中的效用
J Emerg Med. 2016 May;50(5):711-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the recovery profiles of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and remimazolam for intraoperative sedation in patients undergoing upper limb surgery under brachial plexus blockade: a randomized controlled trial.臂丛神经阻滞下上肢手术患者术中使用丙泊酚、右美托咪定和瑞马唑仑镇静的恢复情况比较:一项随机对照试验
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02987-3.
2
Comparison of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl and midazolam in procedural sedation for tube thoracostomy in emergency department - A randomized control study.急诊科胸腔闭式引流术中芬太尼与右美托咪定对比芬太尼与咪达唑仑用于程序镇静的随机对照研究
Turk J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 1;25(2):116-122. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_175_24. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials.围手术期临床试验中麻醉干预措施的设计与报告框架。
BJA Open. 2025 Feb 4;13:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100374. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in sedation dentistry: a scoping review.瑞米唑仑用于牙科镇静的安全性和有效性:一项范围综述
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Feb;25(1):15-22. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.1.15. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
5
A Review of Current Literature of Interest to the Office-Based Anesthesiologist.面向门诊麻醉医生的当前文献综述
Anesth Prog. 2024 May 3;71(1):53-55. doi: 10.2344/348194.
6
Optimizing Pediatric Sedation: Evaluating Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Safety and Efficacy in Clinical Practice.优化小儿镇静:评估瑞马唑仑和右美托咪定在临床实践中的安全性和有效性。
Paediatr Drugs. 2025 Mar;27(2):181-189. doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00659-1. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
7
Procedural sedation competencies: a review and multidisciplinary international consensus statement on knowledge, skills, training, and credentialing.程序性镇静能力:关于知识、技能、培训和资质认证的综述及多学科国际共识声明
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;134(3):817-829. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.036. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
8
Integrated pulmonary index during procedural sedation and analgesia: A cluster-randomized trial.程序性镇静镇痛期间的综合肺指数:一项整群随机试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5563-5572. doi: 10.1111/jan.16286. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
9
Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine alone and dexmedetomidine-chloral hydrate combination sedation for electroencephalography in children: A large retrospective cohort study and propensity score-matched analysis.儿童脑电图检查中鼻内单独使用右美托咪定与右美托咪定 - 水合氯醛联合镇静的比较:一项大型回顾性队列研究和倾向评分匹配分析。
Heliyon. 2024 May 31;10(11):e32236. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32236. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
10
Remimazolam Pilot for Office-Based Dental Sedation: Adverse Events, Awareness and Outcomes.用于门诊牙科镇静的瑞米唑仑试验:不良事件、意识及结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 25;12(23):7308. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237308.