Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, Combe Park, Bath BA13NG, UK; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, Combe Park, Bath BA13NG, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used, but not yet routine practice, for tracheal intubation. Few departments formally trial equipment before adopting it into practice. We describe the decision-making and implementation processes that our department used when introducing universal VL, with the C-MAC (Karl Storz, Germany), throughout our anaesthesia and intensive care departments.
We used a structured process to assess the feasibility of a change to universal VL. After departmental training, we undertook a 2 month trial period of mandating VL for all adult in-theatre intubations. Thereafter, VL remained widely available, but not mandated. We regularly surveyed anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants to evaluate departmental opinion regarding the introduction of universal VL.
Before the trial period, one-third of anaesthetists judged that universal VL would be of overall benefit to patient safety, team dynamics, and quality of care. Reservations from both junior and senior anaesthetists focused on training concerns. Support for a changeover to VL, amongst both anaesthetists and anaesthetic assistants, increased throughout the trial period. Six months after the 2 month trial, support had grown further and was almost unanimous. Anaesthetists reported significant benefits in clinical performance, teaching, and human factors, especially teamwork and situation awareness.
Performing a formal and prolonged trial of mandatory VL in theatre led to changes in perceptions and departmental consensus. As a result of the trial, the department agreed to the use of C-MAC videolaryngoscopy as the default intubation technique throughout theatres and intensive care, with removal of standard Macintosh laryngoscopes from routine use.
视频喉镜(VL)越来越多地用于气管插管,但尚未成为常规实践。很少有部门在采用它之前会对设备进行正式试验。我们描述了我们部门在引入通用 VL(Karl Storz,德国的 C-MAC)时所使用的决策和实施过程,涵盖了我们的麻醉和重症监护部门。
我们使用结构化的流程来评估更改通用 VL 的可行性。在部门培训后,我们进行了为期 2 个月的强制性 VL 试用,用于所有成人手术室插管。此后,VL 仍然广泛可用,但不再强制要求。我们定期调查麻醉师和麻醉助理,以评估引入通用 VL 的部门意见。
在试用前,三分之一的麻醉师认为通用 VL 将对患者安全、团队动态和护理质量整体有益。来自初级和高级麻醉师的保留意见集中在培训问题上。在试用期间,麻醉师和麻醉助理对转换为 VL 的支持不断增加。在 2 个月的试用后 6 个月,支持进一步增加,几乎达到一致。麻醉师报告在临床表现、教学和人为因素方面(尤其是团队合作和态势感知)有显著的获益。
在手术室进行强制性 VL 的正式和长期试验导致了观念和部门共识的变化。由于试验,该部门同意在整个手术室和重症监护室使用 C-MAC 视频喉镜作为默认插管技术,从常规使用中移除标准的 Macintosh 喉镜。