Suppr超能文献

医学生考试中过度自信和信心不足效应的发生率

The Incidence of Overconfidence and Underconfidence Effects in Medical Student Examinations.

作者信息

Borracci Raúl A, Arribalzaga Eduardo B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1223-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overconfidence is the tendency to overestimate the knowledge, capacity, or performance one really possesses. This cognitive bias could be potentially dangerous in medical decision-making, considering the impact it could have on patient health care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of overconfidence and underconfidence in medical student knowledge on general surgery by using traditional and new statistical approaches.

METHODS

During the application of a multiple-choice examination, 251 next-to-graduate medical students were invited to express the accuracy of their responses by choosing their own perceived confidence level for a set of questions. Analysis was done by comparing the difference between percentage of right answers (student's actual knowledge or accuracy) and self-estimated confidence level (student's perceived knowledge or confidence). Overconfidence was defined as a positive difference between confidence and accuracy, and underconfidence as a negative difference.

RESULTS

Nearly 12% of students showed significant overconfidence regarding their actual knowledge or accuracy levels. Better students showed a lower overconfidence effect than students with poorer performance. On the other hand, underconfidence was less likely than overconfidence (8.3% of students), and that effect was most frequently found in students who performed better in examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The small proportion of our students exhibiting overconfidence or underconfidence behaviors moderates the need for educational interventions. Nevertheless, promoting prudence in individualized students manifesting overconfidence, and trust in those reporting significant underconfidence could increase the reliability of medical judgment during their future professional life. Overconfidence in individuals with lower scores in examinations may depend on a ceiling-like effect, since worst ranked students have a wider upper margin to manifest their confidence perceptions. The most confident students showed higher scores in examinations than the less confident ones. From this point of view, confidence could be considered an essential ingredient of success in examination performance.

摘要

背景

过度自信是指高估自己实际拥有的知识、能力或表现的倾向。考虑到这种认知偏差可能对患者医疗保健产生的影响,它在医疗决策中可能具有潜在危险性。本研究的目的是通过使用传统和新的统计方法,评估医学生在普通外科知识方面过度自信和信心不足的发生率。

方法

在一场多项选择题考试中,邀请了251名即将毕业的医学生通过为一组问题选择自己感知到的信心水平来表达他们答案的准确性。通过比较正确答案的百分比(学生的实际知识或准确性)与自我估计的信心水平(学生感知到的知识或信心)之间的差异进行分析。过度自信被定义为信心与准确性之间的正差异,信心不足被定义为负差异。

结果

近12%的学生对自己的实际知识或准确性水平表现出显著的过度自信。成绩较好的学生比成绩较差的学生表现出更低的过度自信效应。另一方面,信心不足的情况比过度自信的情况少见(8.3%的学生),并且这种效应最常出现在考试中表现较好的学生身上。

结论

我们的学生中表现出过度自信或信心不足行为的比例较小,这降低了进行教育干预的必要性。然而,促使表现出过度自信的个别学生保持谨慎,并信任那些报告有明显信心不足的学生,可能会提高他们未来职业生涯中医务判断的可靠性。考试成绩较低的学生过度自信可能取决于一种类似天花板效应的现象,因为排名最差的学生有更宽的上限来表现他们的信心感知。最自信的学生在考试中的得分高于信心较低的学生。从这个角度来看,信心可以被认为是考试成绩成功的一个重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验