Khan Masrur A, Malviya Monica, English Keara, Forman Rebecca, Frisch Stacey, Jordan Kevin, Southern William, Raff Amanda, Aksoy Tulay
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Feb 18;31(2):637-645. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01239-5. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Third year clerkship grades include subjective evaluations. The purpose of this study is to identify if personality traits and self-esteem predispose students to better clerkship performance.
Third-year medical students completed the OCEAN Five Factor Model Personality Test and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Clerkship grades were matched to survey results. Chi-squared and linear regression analyses assessed the correlation between students' clerkship grades, personality traits, and self-esteem.
There was no association between OCEAN personality domains and any component of clerkship grade. In secondary post hoc analysis, students who are "deep thinking" (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.26-7.01, = 0.01), "sophisticated" (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.12-6.50, = 0.03), and "outgoing" (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.02-5.89, = 0.04) were significantly more likely to get an overall clerkship grade of Honors. "Deep thinking" (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.47-8.04, = 0.004) and "efficient" (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.12-7.36, = 0.03) students scored better on shelf exams, while "shy" students scored worse (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.69, = 0.004); "aloof" students received worse clinical scores (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.89, = 0.03), and "rude" (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.03-24.94, = 0.03) and "sophisticated" (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.02-6.00, = 0.04) students received higher preceptor scores. There was no correlation between self-esteem and clerkship grades.
Students with certain personality traits may be predisposed to success during clerkships. Medical educators should be cognizant of biases favoring certain personalities and help students maximize success by recognizing their strengths and identifying gaps.
三年级临床实习成绩包含主观评价。本研究的目的是确定人格特质和自尊是否使学生更易在临床实习中取得良好表现。
三年级医学生完成了大五人格模型人格测试和罗森伯格自尊量表。将临床实习成绩与调查结果进行匹配。卡方检验和线性回归分析评估了学生临床实习成绩、人格特质和自尊之间的相关性。
大五人格领域与临床实习成绩的任何组成部分之间均无关联。在事后的二次分析中,“善于深入思考的”(比值比2.97,95%置信区间1.26 - 7.01,P = 0.01)、“成熟世故的”(比值比2.70,95%置信区间1.12 - 6.50,P = 0.03)和“外向的”(比值比2.45,95%置信区间1.02 - 5.89,P = 0.04)学生获得临床实习总成绩为优等的可能性显著更高。“善于深入思考的”(比值比3.44,95%置信区间1.47 - 8.04,P = 0.004)和“高效的”(比值比2.87,95%置信区间1.12 - 7.36,P = 0.03)学生在结业考试中得分更高,而“害羞的”学生得分更低(比值比0.30,95%置信区间0.13 - 0.69,P = 0.004);“冷漠的”学生临床成绩更差(比值比0.57,95%置信区间0.37 - 0.89,P = 0.03),“粗鲁的”(比值比5.08,95%置信区间1.03 - 24.94,P = 0.03)和“成熟世故的”(比值比2.47,95%置信区间1.02 - 6.00,P = 0.04)学生获得的带教老师评分更高。自尊与临床实习成绩之间无相关性。
具有某些人格特质的学生在临床实习期间可能更容易取得成功。医学教育工作者应意识到对某些人格的偏爱所带来的偏见,并通过认识到学生的优势和找出差距来帮助学生最大限度地取得成功。