Suppr超能文献

[完全性左束支阻滞与左心室肥厚的心电图诊断]

[Complete left branch block and electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy].

作者信息

Fournier C, Blondeau M, Picandet B

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1986 Feb;79(2):184-90.

PMID:2939811
Abstract

The electrocardiogrammes of 71 patients (39 men and 32 women) with transient or intermittent complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) were studied. Two tracings, one with and the other without LBBB were analysed in each case. The interval between the two recordings was less than 90 days in all cases (average 10 days). The diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was established from the ECG without LBBB. The sensitivity and specificity of the classical criteria or indices of LVA and of different associations of indices of LVH were assessed on the ECGs with LBBB. The best criteria of LVH in the presence of LBBB were the SV2 + RV6 greater than or equal to 32 mm (sensitivity 80%; specificity 81%), Sokolow's index greater than or equal to 33 mm (sensitivity 78%, specificity 81%); followed by SV1 greater than or equal to 23 mm (sensitivity 73%, specificity 86%), SV1 + SV2 + RV6 + RV7 greater than or equal to 65 mm (sensitivity 88%, specificity 63%), SV1 + SV2 greater than or equal to 54 mm (sensitivity 73%, specificity 74%). These six parameters allow correct diagnosis of LVH in 81%, 79%, 78%, 79% and 73% of cases, respectively. The SV1 + SV2 + RV5 + RV7 and the SV1 + SV2 + RV6 + RV7 greater than or equal to 65 mm indices are the most stable (same sensitivity and specificity for several consecutive threshold values, i.e. 62 to 67 mm and 64 to 66 mm respectively); the results obtained with these two indices are therefore more likely to be reproducible than those of the other indices as they seem less dependent on the sampling. The indices of LVH based on the QRS amplitude in the precordial leads remain valid in the presence of LBBB and are sufficiently reliable for the diagnosis of LVH to be clinically useful.

摘要

对71例(39例男性和32例女性)患有短暂性或间歇性完全性左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的患者的心电图进行了研究。在每种情况下,分析了两份心电图记录,一份有LBBB,另一份没有LBBB。所有病例中两份记录之间的间隔均小于90天(平均10天)。左心室肥厚(LVH)的诊断是根据没有LBBB的心电图确定的。在有LBBB的心电图上评估了左心室增大(LVA)的经典标准或指标以及LVH指标的不同组合的敏感性和特异性。LBBB存在时LVH的最佳标准是SV2 + RV6大于或等于32 mm(敏感性80%;特异性81%),索科洛夫指数大于或等于33 mm(敏感性78%,特异性81%);其次是SV1大于或等于23 mm(敏感性73%,特异性86%),SV1 + SV2 + RV6 + RV7大于或等于65 mm(敏感性88%,特异性63%),SV1 + SV2大于或等于54 mm(敏感性73%,特异性74%)。这六个参数分别在81%、79%、78%、79%和73%的病例中能够正确诊断LVH。SV1 + SV2 + RV5 + RV7以及SV1 + SV2 + RV6 + RV7大于或等于65 mm这两个指标是最稳定的(对于几个连续的阈值,即分别为62至67 mm和64至66 mm,具有相同的敏感性和特异性);因此,与其他指标相比,这两个指标获得的结果更有可能具有可重复性,因为它们似乎较少依赖于采样。基于胸前导联QRS波振幅的LVH指标在LBBB存在时仍然有效,并且对于LVH的诊断足够可靠,具有临床实用性。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验