Suppr超能文献

左束支传导阻滞患者左心室肥厚的心电图诊断:是否有必要验证旧标准?

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of the left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with left bundle branch block: is it necessary to verify old criteria?

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2012;19(6):591-6. doi: 10.5603/cj.2012.0110.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the presence of the left bundle branch block (LBBB) is difficult. In our study we compared commonly used ECG criteria with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) calculated during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) to verify their clinical value or the need to recalibrate.

METHODS

CMRI and ECG data of 36 patients were included in this study. Based on the ECG measures we used in our study selected ECG criteria for LVH detection in cases with LBBB: QRS duration, amplitude of S waves in V1, V2, V3; R waves in aVL, V5, V6 and combinations of amplitudes. LVH was defined as LVMI (CMRI) exceeding reference values.

RESULTS

LVH was diagnosed in 17 (47%) patients (6 women and 11 men). Following ECG parameters correlated the most prominently with LVMI - RV5: r = 0.5 (p = 0.002), RV6: r = 0.61 (p = 0.0001), SV1+RV5, 6: r = 0.64 (p = 0.001), RaVL+SV3: r = 0.5 (p = 0.002), SV2+RV5, 6: r = 0.71 (p = 0.0001), SV2, 3+RV5, 6: r = 0.75 (p = 0.0001). Based on the results of ROC analysis we proposed new cut points for LVH parameters. The highest diagnostic accuracy achieved S2+SV3 〉 6 mV, SV2,V3+RV5,V6 〉 4 mV, RaVL+SV3 〉 3.5 mV (86-89%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LBBB the ECG parameters based on the amplitude of S wave in V2 or V3 and R wave in the leads aVL, V5, V6 have the highest clinical value in the prediction of the LVH determined by CMRI. It was necessary to recalibrate these parameters and it is needed to verify them in larger number of LBBB patients.

摘要

背景

左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者左心室肥厚(LVH)的诊断较为困难。本研究比较了临床常用心电图标准与心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)计算的左心室质量指数(LVMI),以验证其临床价值或是否需要重新校准。

方法

纳入 36 例患者的 CMRI 和心电图数据。根据本研究中使用的心电图指标,选择 LBBB 患者 LVH 检测的心电图标准:QRS 时限、V1、V2、V3 中 S 波振幅;aVL、V5、V6 中的 R 波以及振幅组合。LVH 定义为 LVMI(CMRI)超过参考值。

结果

17 例(47%)患者诊断为 LVH(6 例女性,11 例男性)。与 LVMI 相关性最强的心电图参数为 RV5:r = 0.5(p = 0.002)、RV6:r = 0.61(p = 0.0001)、SV1+RV5、6:r = 0.64(p = 0.001)、RaVL+SV3:r = 0.5(p = 0.002)、SV2+RV5、6:r = 0.71(p = 0.0001)、SV2、3+RV5、6:r = 0.75(p = 0.0001)。基于 ROC 分析结果,我们提出了新的 LVH 参数切点。S2+SV3 〉6 mV、SV2、V3+RV5、V6 〉4 mV、RaVL+SV3 〉3.5 mV 具有最高的诊断准确性(86-89%)。

结论

在 LBBB 患者中,基于 V2 或 V3 中 S 波振幅和 aVL、V5、V6 导联中 R 波振幅的心电图参数在预测 CMRI 确定的 LVH 方面具有最高的临床价值。需要重新校准这些参数,并在更多的 LBBB 患者中进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验