Anyadike-Danes Michael, Hart Mark
Aston Business School, Birmingham, UK.
J Evol Econ. 2018;28(1):45-76. doi: 10.1007/s00191-017-0549-x. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
The theory of firm growth is in a rather unsatisfactory state. However, the analysis of large firm-level datasets which have become available in recent years allows us to begin building an evidence base which can, in turn, be used to underpin the development of more satisfactory theory. Here we study the 239 thousand UK private sector firms born in 1998 over their first 15 years of life. A first, and quite striking, finding is the extraordinary force of mortality. By age 15, 90% of the UK firms born in 1998 are dead, and, for those surviving to age 15, the hazard of death is still about 10% a year. The chance of death is related to the size and growth of firms in an interesting way. Whilst the hazard rate after 15 years is largely independent of size at birth, it is strongly affected by the current (age 14) size. In particular, firms with more than five employees are half as likely to die in the next year as firms with less than five employees. A second important finding is that most firms, even those which survive to age 15, do not grow very much. By age 15 more than half the 26,000 survivors still have less than five jobs. In other words, the growth paths - what we call the 'growth trajectories' - of most of the 26,000 survivors are pretty flat. However, of the firms that do grow, firms born smaller grow faster than those born larger. Another striking finding is that growth is heavily concentrated in the first five years. Whilst growth does continue, even up to age 15, each year after age five it involves only a relatively small proportion of firms. Finally, there are two groups of survivors which contribute importantly to job creation. Some are those born relatively large (with more than 20 jobs) although their growth rate is quite modest. More striking though, is a very small group of firms born very small with less than five jobs (about 5% of all survivors) which contribute a substantial proportion (more than one third) of the jobs added to the cohort total by age 15.
企业成长理论目前处于一种相当不尽人意的状态。然而,近年来可得的大型企业层面数据集分析使我们能够开始构建一个证据基础,进而用于支撑更完善理论的发展。在此,我们研究了1998年诞生的23.9万家英国私营企业在其最初15年的发展情况。第一个相当惊人的发现是死亡率的巨大影响力。到15岁时,1998年诞生的英国企业中有90%已倒闭,而对于那些存活到15岁的企业,每年的死亡风险仍约为10%。死亡几率与企业的规模和增长呈现出一种有趣的关联。虽然15年后的风险率在很大程度上与出生时的规模无关,但它受到当前(14岁时)规模的强烈影响。特别是,拥有五名以上员工的企业在次年死亡的可能性只有员工不足五名的企业的一半。第二个重要发现是,大多数企业,即使是那些存活到15岁的企业,增长也并不显著。到15岁时,2.6万家存活企业中超过一半的企业仍只有不到五个工作岗位。换句话说,这2.6万家存活企业中大多数的增长路径——我们称之为“增长轨迹”——相当平缓。然而,在那些实现增长的企业中,出生时规模较小的企业比出生时规模较大的企业增长得更快。另一个惊人发现是,增长主要集中在前五年。虽然增长会持续,甚至持续到15岁,但五岁之后每年只有相对较小比例的企业实现增长。最后,有两类存活企业对创造就业有重要贡献。一类是那些出生时规模相对较大(拥有20个以上工作岗位)的企业,尽管它们的增长率相当适度。不过,更引人注目的是一小群出生时规模极小、工作岗位不足五个的企业(约占所有存活企业的5%),它们在15岁时为该群体新增的就业岗位贡献了相当大的比例(超过三分之一)。