DiMasi Joseph A
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Am J Ther. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318269198f.
The R&D productivity of pharmaceutical firms has become an increasingly significant concern of industry, regulators, and policymakers. To address an important aspect of R&D performance, public and private data sources were used to estimate clinical phase transition and clinical approval probabilities for the pipelines of the 50 largest pharmaceutical firms (by sales) by 3 firms size groups (top 10 firms, top 11-20 firms, and top 21-50 firms). For self-originated compounds, the clinical approval success rates were 14.3%, 16.4%, and 18.4% for top 10 firms, top 11-20 firms, and top 21-50 firms, respectively. The results showing higher success rates for smaller firms were largely driven by outcomes for the small-molecule drugs. Adjustments for the relatively small differences in therapeutic class distributions across the firm size groups showed that the success rate for small-molecule self-originated drugs was 6% below average for top 10 firms and 17% above average for top 21-50 firms. Although success rates for small firms were higher, this advantage was offset to some degree by lower returns on approved drugs, suggesting different strategic objectives with regard to risk and reward by firm size.
制药公司的研发生产力已日益成为行业、监管机构和政策制定者关注的重要问题。为了研究研发绩效的一个重要方面,我们利用公共和私人数据源,按3个公司规模组(前10家公司、第11 - 20家公司和第21 - 50家公司)估算了50家最大制药公司(按销售额计算)产品线的临床阶段转换和临床批准概率。对于自主研发的化合物,前10家公司、第11 - 20家公司和第21 - 50家公司的临床批准成功率分别为14.3%、16.4%和18.4%。小公司成功率较高的结果在很大程度上是由小分子药物的结果驱动的。对公司规模组间治疗类别分布相对较小差异的调整显示,前10家公司小分子自主研发药物的成功率比平均水平低6%,而第21 - 50家公司则比平均水平高17%。尽管小公司的成功率较高,但这种优势在一定程度上被获批药物较低的回报率所抵消,这表明不同规模的公司在风险和回报方面有不同的战略目标。