Suppr超能文献

日本房颤患者在直接口服抗凝剂时代继续使用华法林治疗的原因调查:SELECT研究

A survey of reasons for continuing warfarin therapy in the era of direct oral anticoagulants in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: the SELECT study.

作者信息

Ikeda Takanori, Yasaka Masahiro, Kida Makoto, Imura Miki

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo.

Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine and Neurology, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jan 17;12:135-143. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S152584. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although warfarin has historically been the standard of care for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is rapidly increasing. In this study, we examined the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients continuing warfarin therapy and investigated reasons for warfarin continuation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Each study site consecutively registered 10 patients with NVAF who had been taking warfarin for at least 12 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics and international normalized ratio (INR) values were collected from medical records. Physicians responded to questionnaires exploring reasons for continuing warfarin therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 313 patients treated with warfarin were registered at 33 sites. Mean ± SD age was 76.4±9.6 years; 62.9% of patients were male. The proportion of patients with INR values in the therapeutic range was 74.6% and 48.8% among patients aged ≥70 years and <70 years, respectively. Over half of the patients (51.4%) had been advised to switch from warfarin to DOACs; the primary physician-reported reason for this recommendation was superior safety and effectiveness. However, patients reported continuing warfarin because of the high price of DOACs (47.2%) and long-term positive experiences with warfarin (31.7%). The remaining 48.6% of patients with NVAF had never been counseled by their physicians about DOACs as an alternative to warfarin. For 76% of these patients, physicians favored warfarin for medical reasons, such as impaired renal function and controlled INR, but in the remaining patients, medical reasons for continuing warfarin were lacking.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the patients in this study were informed of warfarin alternatives primarily for improved efficacy and safety, but elected not to change regimens because of the high price of DOACs and long-term positive experiences with warfarin. In the remaining half, physician preference or specific patient characteristics prevented a change in therapy.

摘要

目的

尽管华法林一直是预防非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者缺血性卒中的标准治疗药物,但直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的使用正在迅速增加。在本研究中,我们检查了继续接受华法林治疗的患者的人口统计学和临床特征,并调查了继续使用华法林的原因。

患者与方法

每个研究地点连续登记10例服用华法林至少12个月的NVAF患者。从病历中收集人口统计学和临床特征以及国际标准化比值(INR)值。医生回答了探索继续使用华法林治疗原因的问卷。

结果

总体而言,33个研究地点共登记了313例接受华法林治疗的患者。平均年龄±标准差为76.4±9.6岁;62.9%的患者为男性。年龄≥70岁和<70岁的患者中,INR值在治疗范围内的比例分别为74.6%和48.8%。超过一半的患者(51.4%)曾被建议从华法林转换为DOACs;主治医生报告的这一建议的主要原因是安全性和有效性更高。然而,患者报告继续使用华法林是因为DOACs价格高(47.2%)以及对华法林有长期的良好体验(31.7%)。其余48.6%的NVAF患者从未被医生告知DOACs可作为华法林的替代药物。对于其中76%的患者,医生出于医学原因倾向于使用华法林,如肾功能受损和INR得到控制,但在其余患者中,缺乏继续使用华法林的医学原因。

结论

本研究中约一半的患者被告知华法林的替代药物主要是为了提高疗效和安全性,但由于DOACs价格高以及对华法林有长期的良好体验而选择不改变治疗方案。在其余一半患者中,医生的偏好或特定的患者特征阻止了治疗方案的改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba34/5775732/f148cd28d58b/ppa-12-135Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验