Suppr超能文献

教练对技能的评价及其与实践、比赛的关系,以及在足球领域从青年精英到成年职业的成功过渡。

Coach ratings of skills and their relations to practice, play and successful transitions from youth-elite to adult-professional status in soccer.

机构信息

a School of Kinesiology , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada.

b Department of Health, Kinesiology and Recreation , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2018 Sep;36(17):2009-2017. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1432236. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

Abstract

Elite soccer players (15 yr) from professional academies in the UK were rated on technical, tactical, physical and creative skills by coaches at time 1 (T1). Players estimated accumulated hours in soccer practice (coach-led activities) and play (self-led activities) during childhood. Coach-ratings were again collected 2.5 yr later (T2) for players that received a professional contract (17 yr). Adult-professional status was determined at T3 (~ 20 yr). Skill ratings distinguished across the three "future" groups (academy-only, youth-professional only and adult-professional), for all but creative skill. For players that transitioned to youth-professional, medium sized correlations were noted between childhood practice amounts and technical and creative skill ratings at T1, although practice amounts correlated more strongly with skill ratings at T2. Play amounts were not related to any skills. Within groups of youth elite athletes, domain-specific play in childhood, and to a lesser degree practice, were generally not good discriminators of specific-skills. The effects of sport-specific practice on the development (and discriminability) of skills takes time to emerge. We consider the implications for talent development models and purported links between play and creativity.

摘要

英国职业学院的精英足球运动员(约 15 岁)在 T1 时由教练对其技术、战术、体能和创造力技能进行评分。球员们估计了他们在童年时期的足球训练(教练指导活动)和比赛(自主活动)中积累的时间。2.5 年后(T2),对于那些获得职业合同的球员(约 17 岁),教练再次进行评分。成年职业状态在 T3(约 20 岁)确定。技能评分在三个“未来”群体(仅学院、仅青年职业和成年职业)之间有所区分,但创造力技能除外。对于过渡到青年职业的球员,在 T1 时,童年时期的训练量与技术和创造力技能评分之间存在中等程度的相关性,尽管训练量与 T2 时的技能评分相关性更强。比赛量与任何技能都没有关系。在青年精英运动员群体中,童年时期的特定领域比赛,以及在较小程度上的训练,通常不能很好地区分特定技能。特定运动训练对技能发展(和可区分性)的影响需要时间才能显现。我们考虑了对人才发展模式的影响以及据称的比赛和创造力之间的联系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验