• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外生命支持下心源性休克急性心肌梗死后血运重建的结果。

Outcome after revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock on extracorporeal life support.

机构信息

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMR_S 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Département de Cardiologie, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2160-e2168. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01014.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01014
PMID:29400656
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of the study was to identify independent correlates of survival in patients undergoing PCI for refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction (RCS-MI) with the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This observational single tertiary centre study enrolled 106 consecutive patients (52.7±10.4 years) with ECLS placed before or after the PCI. Half of the patients had triple vessel disease and PCI was attempted whenever possible (74.5%). The 30-day mortality rate was 63.2%. Left main culprit vessel disease (19% of patients) (adj. HR [95% CI]: 2.31 [1.27-4.18], p=0.006) and sepsis-related organ failure assessment ≥13 (adj. HR 2.17 [1.25-3.75], p=0.005) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. The use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) combined with ECLS was an independent protective factor (adj. HR 0.48 [0.28-0.80], p=0.006). Neither complete (p=0.66) nor successful (p=0.69) myocardial revascularisation was associated with 30-day survival.

CONCLUSIONS

RCS in MI patients often reveals a severe multivessel coronary artery disease with no impact of early percutaneous coronary revascularisation on clinical outcome. The survival advantage of IABP when combined with ECLS further suggests that achieving an early effective haemodynamic support should be the major goal in this young patient population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定因心肌梗死(RCS-MI)导致的心源性休克而需要体外生命支持(ECLS)的患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后独立的生存相关因素。

方法和结果

本观察性、单中心、三级研究纳入了 106 例连续患者(52.7±10.4 岁),这些患者在接受 PCI 之前或之后均放置了 ECLS。一半的患者存在三支血管病变,并且只要有可能就会尝试 PCI(74.5%)。30 天死亡率为 63.2%。左主干罪犯血管病变(19%的患者)(校正 HR [95%CI]:2.31 [1.27-4.18],p=0.006)和与脓毒症相关的器官衰竭评估≥13 分(校正 HR 2.17 [1.25-3.75],p=0.005)与 30 天死亡率独立相关。使用主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)联合 ECLS 是一个独立的保护因素(校正 HR 0.48 [0.28-0.80],p=0.006)。完全(p=0.66)或成功(p=0.69)的血运重建均与 30 天生存率无关。

结论

MI 患者的心源性休克常伴有严重的多支冠状动脉疾病,早期经皮冠状动脉血运重建对临床结局无影响。IABP 与 ECLS 联合使用的生存优势进一步表明,在这一年轻患者群体中,实现早期有效的血液动力学支持应是主要目标。

相似文献

1
Outcome after revascularisation of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock on extracorporeal life support.体外生命支持下心源性休克急性心肌梗死后血运重建的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2160-e2168. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01014.
2
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克早期机械循环支持的可行性:底特律心源性休克倡议
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
Extracorporeal life support in the multidisciplinary management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.体外生命支持在急性心肌梗死后合并心原性休克的多学科综合管理中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):E71-E77. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28316. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Editor's Choice- Impact of immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention on 1-year outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Results of the randomised IABP-SHOCK II trial.编辑精选-急性心肌梗死并发心原性休克患者行即刻多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与罪犯病变介入治疗对 1 年预后的影响:随机 IABP-SHOCK II 试验结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Oct;6(7):601-609. doi: 10.1177/2048872616668977. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Impact of intra-aortic balloon pump support initiated before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction.主动脉内球囊反搏支持在急性心肌梗死后心原性休克患者中在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之前与之后开始的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3758-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
6
Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.急性心肌梗合并需要静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合的晚期心源性休克患者中,罪犯血管血运重建与即刻多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e029792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029792. Epub 2023 May 9.
7
Correlates for mortality in patients presented with acute myocardial infarct complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者死亡的相关因素。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.08.012.
8
Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.主动脉内球囊反搏在需要静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合的心源性休克中的应用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006930. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006930.
9
Intra-aortic balloon pump in acute chest pain and cardiogenic shock - a long-term follow-up.主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性胸痛和心源性休克的长期随访
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Dec;53(6):337-341. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1657938. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克时罪犯血管单独干预与多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Nov;20(11):956-964. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.12.015. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗的心源性休克患者的左心室卸载
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Aug 21;5(5):oeaf103. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf103. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对体外膜肺氧合支持下的急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的影响。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 23;25(12):449. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512449. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Concurrent intra-aortic balloon pump and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute coronary syndrome-related cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis of multivariate studies.
主动脉内球囊反搏与静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合联合治疗急性冠状动脉综合征相关心源性休克:多变量研究的荟萃分析
Biomol Biomed. 2025 Apr 26;25(6):1233-1244. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11011.
4
Different strategies in left ventricle unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A network meta-analysis.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合期间左心室卸载的不同策略:一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Sep 4;54:101506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101506. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Meta-analysis of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump vs. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation only in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克患者中,体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏与单纯体外膜肺氧合的荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 18;9:1104357. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1104357. eCollection 2022.
6
Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life in Non-Surgical Adult Patients Supported with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Oxygenation.接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合支持的非手术成年患者的长期生存及生活质量
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 31;11(21):6452. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216452.
7
Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的疗效。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e023713. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023713. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
Outcome of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Combined with Intraaortic Balloon Pump Hemodynamic Support during the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process for Patients with Cardiac Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用效果。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 7;2022:1350673. doi: 10.1155/2022/1350673. eCollection 2022.
9
Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的当代设备管理
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 May;27(3):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10088-8. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Culprit lesion location and outcomes in patients with multivessel disease and infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a core laboratory analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial.罪犯病变位置和多支血管病变合并梗死相关心原性休克患者的结局:CULPRIT-SHOCK 试验的核心实验室分析。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Aug 6;17(5):e418-e424. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00561.