Different strategies in left ventricle unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) overload is a frequent complication during VA-ECMO associated with poor outcomes. Many strategies of LV unloading have been documented but lack of evidence shows which is better. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare different LV unloading strategies.

METHODS

We searched databases for all published studies on LV unloading strategies during VA-ECMO. The pre-defined primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

45 observational studies (34235 patients) were included. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking values (SUCRA) demonstrated that compared to no unloading strategy (15.4 %), IABP (73.8 %), pLVAD (60.8 %), atrial septostomy (51.2 %), catheter venting (48.8 %) were all associated with decreased all-cause mortality, in which IABP and pLVAD existed statistical significance. For secondary outcomes, no unloading group had the shortest VA-ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, and the lower risk of complications compared with unloading strategies. IABP was associated with reducing VA-ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, and the risk of complications (except for hemolysis as the second best) compared with other unloading strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

LV unloading strategies during VA-ECMO were associated with improved survival compared to no unloading, but the tendency to increase the risk of various complications deserves more consideration.