• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械循环支持治疗心原性休克的全国趋势、使用预测因素和院内结局。

National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.

机构信息

Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2152-e2159. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00947.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00947
PMID:29400657
Abstract

AIMS

Despite rising rates of cardiogenic shock (CS), data on trends and in-hospital outcomes of short-term non-durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are limited. Thus, we aimed to identify recent national trends in MCS utilisation in the USA, patient-level predictors of MCS use, and in-hospital outcomes in CS inclusive of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hospitalisations of US adults with a discharge diagnosis of CS, from January 2004 to December 2014, in the National Inpatient Sample were included. Rates of MCS were stratified by device type and clinical presentation. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospitalisation costs, and number of procedures. A total of 183,516 hospitalisations with CS (47,636 [25.9%] involving MCS) were included. MCS recipients were younger, less frequently female, received more procedures, had higher costs, and more frequently presented with MI (MCS vs. non-MCS: 71.6% vs. 42.9%; p<0.0001). Growth in CS hospitalisations (214.4%) outpaced annual MCS use (160.0%), with relative declines in intra-aortic balloon pump use starting in 2008. Right heart catheterisation rates for both groups remained low (MCS vs. non-MCS: 5.9% vs. 3.3%; p<0.0001). In-hospital mortality declined but remained high in both groups (MCS vs. non-MCS [2014]: 32.7% vs. 41.5%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality for CS has declined but remains high. Rates of CS have outpaced MCS utilisation which remains uncommon in non-MI hospitalisations with shock. MCS is associated with utilisation of other procedures during hospitalisation.

摘要

目的

尽管心源性休克(CS)的发生率不断上升,但有关短期非耐久性机械循环支持(MCS)趋势和院内结局的数据有限。因此,我们旨在确定美国近期 MCS 使用的全国趋势、MCS 使用的患者水平预测因素以及包括体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)在内的 CS 院内结局。

方法和结果

纳入了 2004 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间国家住院患者样本中美国成年人因 CS 出院诊断的住院患者。根据设备类型和临床表现对 MCS 率进行分层。结局包括院内死亡率、住院费用和手术次数。共纳入 183516 例 CS 住院患者(47636 [25.9%] 例涉及 MCS)。MCS 接受者年龄更小,女性比例更低,接受的手术更多,费用更高,更常出现心肌梗死(MCS 与非 MCS:71.6%与 42.9%;p<0.0001)。CS 住院患者的增长率(214.4%)超过了 MCS 使用的年增长率(160.0%),自 2008 年以来,主动脉内球囊泵的使用相对减少。两组的右心导管检查率均较低(MCS 与非 MCS:5.9%与 3.3%;p<0.0001)。尽管两组的院内死亡率均有所下降,但仍居高不下(MCS 与非 MCS [2014 年]:32.7%与 41.5%;p<0.0001)。

结论

CS 的院内死亡率虽有所下降,但仍居高不下。CS 的发生率超过了 MCS 的使用率,而非 MI 合并休克的住院患者中 MCS 仍不常见。MCS 与住院期间其他手术的使用相关。

相似文献

1
National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.机械循环支持治疗心原性休克的全国趋势、使用预测因素和院内结局。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2152-e2159. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00947.
2
Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.美国急性心肌梗死合并非梗死相关心原性休克患者应用机械循环支持治疗的趋势和院内死亡率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Apr;107(4):287-303. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
3
Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.心肌梗死后合并心源性休克患者短期非耐久性机械循环支持的应用在医院间的差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007270. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007270.
4
Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.在重症心脏病学试验网络(CCCTN)注册中心,临时机械循环支持在休克中的临床实践模式。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006635. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Trends in the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者使用机械循环支持装置的趋势
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1772-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.015.
6
Temporal trends of survival and utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.院内心搏骤停继发于室性心动过速/心室颤动患者应用机械循环支持装置的生存和应用的时间趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 1;94(4):578-587. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28138. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.美国 2000 年至 2014 年体外膜肺氧合在急性心肌梗死中的应用。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;12(12):e005929. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.005929. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
8
Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持的当代趋势。
Open Heart. 2020 Mar 4;7(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214. eCollection 2020.
9
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克早期机械循环支持的可行性:底特律心源性休克倡议
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):454-461. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27427. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock.心脏手术后心原性休克患者应用临时机械循环支持的趋势、预测因素和结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;123(3):489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死心源性休克的临时机械循环支持
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 Aug 12;21(4):14-25. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1654. eCollection 2025.
2
Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock.心脏骤停和心源性休克的体外生命支持
US Cardiol. 2021 Nov 10;15:e23. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.13. eCollection 2021.
3
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock: Current Studies and Future Directions.
急性心肌梗死所致心源性休克中的机械循环支持装置:当前研究与未来方向
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 27;2(2):100586. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100586. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
4
Volume-outcome relationships for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死体外膜肺氧合的容量-结局关系
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):156-163. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00976-1. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
5
SCAI Staging Application for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock at a Single-Center Russian Registry.俄罗斯单中心注册研究中SCAI对急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克的分期应用
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 17;12(24):7739. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247739.
6
Age and associated outcomes among patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗患者的年龄及相关预后——体外生命支持组织注册研究分析
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Dec;49(12):1456-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07199-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump or No Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.经皮微轴左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵或无机械循环支持治疗心源性休克患者的比较效果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):744-754. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1643.
8
Bridging with surgically placed microaxial left ventricular assist devices: a high-volume centre experience.外科植入微型左心室辅助装置桥接治疗:大容量中心经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jun 1;63(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad116.
9
Short-term mechanical circulatory support: Transitioning the patient to the next stage.短期机械循环支持:将患者过渡到下一阶段。
JTCVS Open. 2020 Apr 13;2:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Resources for cardiovascular healthcare associated with 30-day mortality in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者30天死亡率相关的心血管医疗资源
Eur Heart J Open. 2021 Dec 31;2(1):oeab047. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeab047. eCollection 2022 Jan.