• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄罗斯单中心注册研究中SCAI对急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克的分期应用

SCAI Staging Application for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock at a Single-Center Russian Registry.

作者信息

Ryabov Vyacheslav V, Panteleev Oleg O, Kercheva Maria A, Gorokhovsky Alexei A, Syrkina Anna G, Margolis Natalia Y

机构信息

Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia.

Cardiology Division, Siberian State Medical University, 2 Moscovsky Trakt, 634055 Tomsk, Russia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 17;12(24):7739. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247739.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12247739
PMID:38137809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10743544/
Abstract

AIM

To access the features of the course of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with different stages of MI complicated by cardiogenic shock (MI CS) according to the SCAI scale.

METHODS

We retrospectively described the portrait of CS MI ( = 117) at different stages of SCAI from the hospital MI registry ( = 1253).

RESULTS

Hospital mortality increased from stage to stage ( ≤ 0.001). Significant differences in biochemical parameters were found both for indicators characterizing intensive care measures, such as the presence of mechanical lung ventilation or an intra-aortic balloon pump, and for indicators of organ hypoperfusion such as lactate level, pHv (7.39 (7.36; 7.44) at stage A-B; 7.14 (7.06; 7.18) at stage E), creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate. Parameters related to MI characteristics, such as instrumental and laboratory data, anamnesis of ischemia, and performed treatment, did not differ between groups. Polynomial logistic regression showed that lactate level, mechanical ventilation, and monocyte count upon admission (1.15 (0.96; 1.23) at stage A-B; 0.78 (0.49; 0.94) at stage E, = 0.005) correlated with CS severity.

CONCLUSION

The characteristics of MI at different stages of SCAI do not have differences and do not determine the severity of shock. We revealed a high discriminatory potential of the pH level in predicting refractory shock. The value of monocytes at admission may be a promising predictor of the severity of MI CS. The question of the causes of heterogeneity of MI CS, taking into account the homogeneity of MI characteristics, remains open and promising.

摘要

目的

根据SCAI量表评估不同阶段心肌梗死(MI)合并心源性休克(MI CS)患者的心肌梗死病程特征。

方法

我们从医院心肌梗死登记处(n = 1253)回顾性描述了处于SCAI不同阶段的CS MI患者(n = 117)的情况。

结果

医院死亡率逐阶段增加(P≤0.001)。在表征重症监护措施的指标(如机械通气或主动脉内球囊泵的使用情况)以及器官低灌注指标(如乳酸水平、pHv(A - B阶段为7.39(7.36;7.44);E阶段为7.14(7.06;7.18))、肌酐和肾小球滤过率)方面,均发现了生化参数的显著差异。与MI特征相关的参数,如仪器和实验室数据、缺血病史及所实施的治疗,在各组之间并无差异。多项式逻辑回归显示,乳酸水平、机械通气以及入院时的单核细胞计数(A - B阶段为1.15(0.96;1.23);E阶段为0.78(0.49;0.94),P = 0.005)与CS严重程度相关。

结论

SCAI不同阶段的MI特征并无差异,也不能决定休克的严重程度。我们发现pH水平在预测难治性休克方面具有较高的鉴别潜力。入院时单核细胞的值可能是MI CS严重程度的一个有前景的预测指标。考虑到MI特征的同质性,MI CS异质性的原因问题仍然悬而未决且颇具前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/e9cb13b0a704/jcm-12-07739-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/ab8d807460d2/jcm-12-07739-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/065960ba3217/jcm-12-07739-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/03ce7c570259/jcm-12-07739-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/5efbd885d6b3/jcm-12-07739-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/e9cb13b0a704/jcm-12-07739-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/ab8d807460d2/jcm-12-07739-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/065960ba3217/jcm-12-07739-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/03ce7c570259/jcm-12-07739-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/5efbd885d6b3/jcm-12-07739-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aa5/10743544/e9cb13b0a704/jcm-12-07739-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
SCAI Staging Application for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock at a Single-Center Russian Registry.俄罗斯单中心注册研究中SCAI对急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克的分期应用
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 17;12(24):7739. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247739.
2
Application of Cardiogenic Shock Working Group-defined Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (CSWG-SCAI) Staging of Cardiogenic Shock to the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database.将心源性休克工作组定义的心血管造影和介入学会(CSWG-SCAI)心源性休克分期应用于重症监护医学信息集市IV(MIMIC-IV)数据库。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Dec;57:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
3
Serial Shock Severity Assessment Within 72 Hours After Diagnosis: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report.诊断后72小时内的连续休克严重程度评估:心源性休克工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.069.
4
Influence of intra-aortic balloon pump on mortality as a function of cardiogenic shock severity.主动脉内球囊反搏对心原性休克严重程度相关死亡率的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):293-304. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29800. Epub 2021 May 28.
5
[The Value of Using SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Stages in Predicting Mortality in CICU Patients].[使用SCAI心源性休克分期预测重症监护病房患者死亡率的价值]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 May;52(3):503-509. doi: 10.12182/20210560104.
6
Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.对心源性休克患者进行有创血流动力学评估和院内死亡率风险分类。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Prognostic effect of sex according to shock severity in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中,根据休克严重程度分析性别的预后影响。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2025 Mar-Apr;82:3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
8
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
9
SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 registry.24 小时再分类预测心原性休克结局:来自 Altshock-2 注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):22-32. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30484. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
10
Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.定义心源性休克严重程度分期的标准。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utility and Validation of SCAI-CSWG Stages in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.SCAI-CSWG分期在急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者中的效用及验证
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Nov 19;4(1):102461. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102461. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Myocardial Infarction-Associated Shock: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phenotypes, SCAI Classification, and Outcome Assessment.心肌梗死相关休克:对表型、SCAI分类及结局评估的综合分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 13;61(1):103. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010103.

本文引用的文献

1
SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 registry.24 小时再分类预测心原性休克结局:来自 Altshock-2 注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):22-32. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30484. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
2
Phenotyping and Hemodynamic Assessment in Cardiogenic Shock: From Physiology to Clinical Application.心源性休克的表型分析与血流动力学评估:从生理学到临床应用
Cardiol Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):509-522. doi: 10.1007/s40119-022-00286-2. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
Cardiogenic shock related cardiovascular disease mortality trends in US population: Heart failure vs. acute myocardial infarction as contributing causes.
美国人群中心源性休克相关心血管疾病死亡率趋势:心力衰竭与急性心肌梗死作为促成因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Nov 15;367:45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.08.043. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
4
[Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock of stages A and B].[主动脉内球囊反搏在A、B期心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用]
Kardiologiia. 2022 Jul 31;62(7):68-72. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2022.7.n2156.
5
Application of the SCAI classification to admission of patients with cardiogenic shock: Analysis of a tertiary care center in a middle-income country.应用 SCAI 分类对心源性休克患者进行入院评估:来自中高收入国家的一家三级医疗中心的分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 16;17(8):e0273086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273086. eCollection 2022.
6
Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.定义心源性休克严重程度分期的标准。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.
7
Key Concepts Surrounding Cardiogenic Shock.围绕心源性休克的关键概念。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Nov;47(11):101303. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101303. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
8
The landscape of cardiogenic shock: epidemiology and current definitions.心源性休克的概况:流行病学与当前定义
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 May 1;37(3):236-240. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000957. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
9
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月获得美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
10
Validation of cardiogenic shock phenotypes in a mixed cardiac intensive care unit population.在混合心脏重症监护病房人群中对心源性休克表型的验证。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):1006-1014. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30103. Epub 2022 Jan 25.