Mary Nix (
Peggy McNamara is a senior fellow at AHRQ.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):205-212. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1144.
Learning collaboratives are increasingly used as mechanisms to support and hasten the diffusion and implementation of innovation, clinical evidence, and effective models of care. Factors contributing to the collaboratives' success or failure are poorly understood. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has sponsored collaboratives for nearly two decades to support improvements in health care quality and value by accelerating the diffusion and implementation of innovation. We examined AHRQ's experience with these collaboratives to characterize their attributes, identify factors that might contribute to their success or failure, and assess the challenges they encountered. Building on the literature and insights from AHRQ's experience, we propose a taxonomy that can offer guidance to decision makers and funders about the factors they should consider in developing collaboratives and planning their evaluation, as well as to researchers who seek to conduct research that will ultimately help decision makers make better investments in diffusing innovation and evidence.
学习型协作组织越来越多地被用作支持和加速创新、临床证据和有效护理模式传播和实施的机制。协作组织成功或失败的因素了解甚少。近二十年来,美国医疗保健研究与质量署(AHRQ)一直赞助协作组织,以通过加速创新的传播和实施来支持改善医疗保健质量和价值。我们研究了 AHRQ 在这些协作组织方面的经验,以描述其特征,确定可能导致其成功或失败的因素,并评估它们所面临的挑战。在借鉴文献和 AHRQ 经验的基础上,我们提出了一个分类法,可以为决策者和资助者提供指导,帮助他们在制定协作组织和规划评估时考虑应考虑的因素,以及为寻求开展研究的研究人员提供指导,最终帮助决策者在传播创新和证据方面做出更好的投资。