Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Arthrex Inc, Naples, Florida, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1199-1204. doi: 10.1177/0363546517751916. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Patellar tendon repair with braided polyethylene suture alone is subject to knot slippage and failure. Several techniques to augment the primary repair have been described. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate a novel patellar tendon repair technique augmented with a knotless suture anchor internal brace with suture tape (SAIB). The hypothesis was that this technique would be biomechanically superior to a nonaugmented repair and equivalent to a standard augmentation with an 18-gauge steel wire.
Controlled laboratory study.
Midsubstance patellar tendon tears were created in 32 human cadaveric knees. Two comparison groups were created. Group 1 compared #2 supersuture repair without augmentation to #2 supersuture repair with SAIB augmentation. Group 2 compared #2 supersuture repair with an 18-gauge stainless steel cerclage wire augmentation to #2 supersuture repair with SAIB augmentation. The specimens were potted and biomechanically loaded on a materials testing machine. Yield load, maximum load, mode of failure, plastic displacement, elastic displacement, and total displacement were calculated for each sample. Standard statistical analysis was performed.
There was a statistically significant increase in the mean ± SD yield load and maximum load in the SAIB augmentation group compared with supersuture alone (mean yield load: 646 ± 202 N vs 229 ± 60 N; mean maximum load: 868 ± 162 N vs 365 ± 54 N; P < .001). Group 2 showed no statistically significant differences between the augmented repairs (mean yield load: 495 ± 213 N vs 566 ± 172 N; P = .476; mean maximum load: 737 ± 210 N vs 697 ± 130 N; P = .721).
Patellar tendon repair augmented with SAIB is biomechanically superior to repair without augmentation and is equivalent to repair with augmentation with an 18-gauge stainless steel cerclage wire.
This novel patellar tendon repair augmentation is equivalent to standard 18-gauge wire augmentation at time zero. It does not require a second surgery for removal, and it is biomechanically superior to primary repair alone.
单纯使用编织聚乙烯缝线修复髌腱容易发生结滑脱和失败。已经描述了几种增强初次修复的技术。目的/假设:目的是评估一种新型髌腱修复技术,该技术采用无结缝线锚定内部支撑带缝线(SAIB)增强。假设这种技术在生物力学上优于未增强的修复,与标准的 18 号钢丝增强相当。
对照实验室研究。
在 32 个人体尸体膝关节中创建髌腱中部撕裂。创建了两个比较组。第 1 组比较#2 超缝线修复无增强与#2 超缝线修复加 SAIB 增强。第 2 组比较#2 超缝线修复加 18 号不锈钢环扎钢丝增强与#2 超缝线修复加 SAIB 增强。标本被盆栽并在材料试验机上进行生物力学加载。为每个样本计算屈服载荷、最大载荷、失效模式、塑性位移、弹性位移和总位移。进行了标准的统计分析。
与单独使用超缝线相比,SAIB 增强组的平均±SD 屈服载荷和最大载荷均有统计学显著增加(平均屈服载荷:646±202N 与 229±60N;平均最大载荷:868±162N 与 365±54N;P<0.001)。第 2 组增强修复之间无统计学显著差异(平均屈服载荷:495±213N 与 566±172N;P=0.476;平均最大载荷:737±210N 与 697±130N;P=0.721)。
用 SAIB 增强的髌腱修复在生物力学上优于未增强的修复,与用 18 号不锈钢环扎钢丝增强的修复相当。
这种新型髌腱修复增强在零时刻与标准的 18 号钢丝增强相当。它不需要进行第二次手术取出,在生物力学上优于单纯初次修复。