Sherman Seth L, Black Brandee, Mooberry Matthew A, Freeman Katie L, Gulbrandsen Trevor R, Milles Jeffrey L, Evans Laura, Flood David, Pfeiffer Ferris
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
J Knee Surg. 2019 Aug;32(8):825-832. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669790. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
The objective of this study is to compare the cyclic loading strength and ultimate failure load in suture anchor repair versus transosseous tunnel repair of patellar tendons using a cadaver model. Twelve cadaveric patella specimens were used (six matched pairs). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were performed to ensure equal bone quality among groups. All right knees were assigned to the suture anchor repair group ( = 6), whereas all left knees were assigned to the transosseous bone tunnel group ( = 6). Suture type and repair configuration were equivalent. After the respective procedures were performed, each patella was mounted into a gripping jig. Tensile load was applied at a rate of 1 Hz between magnitudes of 50 and 150 N, 50 and 200 N, 50 and 250 N, and tensile load at a rate of 0.1 mm/s until failure. Failure was defined as a sharp deviation in the linear load versus displacement curve, and failure mode was recorded. DXA measurements demonstrated equivalence of bone quality between the two groups ( > 0.05). During cyclic load testing, there was only a statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to cyclic loading at the 50 to 200 N loading cycle ( = 0.010). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to ultimate load to failure ( = 0.43). Failure mode within the suture anchor cohort occurred through anchor pullout except for one, which failed through the tendon. All specimens within the transosseous cohort failed through the midsubstance of the tendon except for one, which failed through suture breakage. Suture anchor repair demonstrated a similar biomechanical profile regarding cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure when compared with "gold standard" transosseous tunnel patellar tendon repair with a trend toward less gapping in the suture anchor group. Using suture anchors for repair of the patella tendon has similar biomechanical properties to transpatellar tunnels but may provide other clinical advantages.
本研究的目的是使用尸体模型比较髌骨肌腱缝线锚钉修复与经骨隧道修复的循环加载强度和极限破坏载荷。使用了12个尸体髌骨标本(6对匹配样本)。进行双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)测量以确保各组之间骨质量相等。所有右膝被分配到缝线锚钉修复组(n = 6),而所有左膝被分配到经骨隧道组(n = 6)。缝线类型和修复构型相同。在进行各自的手术操作后,将每个髌骨安装到夹具中。以1Hz的速率在50至150N、50至200N、50至250N的幅值之间施加拉伸载荷,并以0.1mm/s的速率施加拉伸载荷直至破坏。破坏定义为线性载荷与位移曲线中的急剧偏差,并记录破坏模式。DXA测量表明两组之间骨质量相当(P>0.05)。在循环载荷测试期间,仅在50至200N加载循环的循环加载方面两组之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.010)。在极限破坏载荷方面两组之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.43)。缝线锚钉组内除1例通过肌腱破坏外,其余均通过锚钉拔出发生破坏。经骨组内除1例通过缝线断裂破坏外,所有标本均通过肌腱中部发生破坏。与“金标准”经骨隧道髌骨肌腱修复相比,缝线锚钉修复在循环加载和极限破坏载荷方面表现出相似的生物力学特征,缝线锚钉组有间隙更小的趋势。使用缝线锚钉修复髌骨肌腱与经髌隧道修复具有相似的生物力学特性,但可能具有其他临床优势。