Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, 60 Murray Street, 4th floor, Box 13, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3L9, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1066-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 May 7.
To examine the association between family companion presence during pre-surgical visits to discuss major cancer surgery and patient-provider communication and satisfaction.
Secondary analysis of 61 pre-surgical visit recordings with eight surgical oncologists at an academic tertiary care hospital using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Surgeons, patients, and companions completed post-visit satisfaction questionnaires. Poisson and logistic regression models assessed differences in communication and satisfaction when companions were present vs. absent.
There were 46 visits (75%) in which companions were present, and 15 (25%) in which companions were absent. Companion communication was largely emotional and facilitative, as measured by RIAS. Companion presence was associated with more surgeon talk (IRR 1.29, p = 0.006), and medical information-giving (IRR 1.41, p = 0.001). Companion presence was associated with less disclosure of lifestyle/psychosocial topics by patients (IRR 0.55, p = 0.037). In adjusted analyses, companions' presence was associated with lower levels of patient-centeredness (IRR 0.77, p 0.004). There were no differences in patient or surgeon satisfaction based on companion presence.
Companions' presence during pre-surgical visits was associated with patient-surgeon communication but was not associated with patient or surgeon satisfaction.
Future work is needed to develop interventions to enhance patient-companion-provider interactions in this setting.
探讨术前探访时家属陪伴对讨论癌症大手术的患者-医生沟通和满意度的影响。
对 8 位外科肿瘤医生在一家学术型三级护理医院进行的 61 次术前探访记录进行二次分析,使用 Roter 互动分析系统(RIAS)。外科医生、患者和陪同者在探访结束后填写满意度问卷。采用泊松和逻辑回归模型评估有陪诊和无陪诊时沟通和满意度的差异。
46 次探访(75%)有家属陪伴,15 次(25%)没有家属陪伴。根据 RIAS 评估,家属的沟通主要是情感支持和促进作用。家属在场与更多的外科医生谈话(IRR 1.29,p=0.006)和医疗信息提供(IRR 1.41,p=0.001)有关。家属在场与患者较少透露生活方式/心理社会话题有关(IRR 0.55,p=0.037)。在调整分析中,家属在场与患者为中心程度较低有关(IRR 0.77,p<0.004)。根据家属在场与否,患者或外科医生的满意度没有差异。
术前探访时家属的陪伴与患者-医生沟通有关,但与患者或外科医生的满意度无关。
需要进一步研究以制定干预措施,改善这种情况下患者-家属-医生的互动。