Suppr超能文献

医疗服务提供者对妇科癌症治疗预约期间护理人员沟通行为的评估。

Healthcare provider assessments of caregiver communication behaviors during gynecologic Cancer treatment appointments.

作者信息

Senger Angela, Venetis Maria K, Greene Kathryn, Catona Danielle, Devine Katie A

机构信息

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Department of Communication, 4 Huntington Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Pediatric Population Science, Outcomes, and Disparities Research, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 1;4:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers often accompany patients to cancer-related medical appointments. Limited research exists on healthcare providers' (HCPs) evaluation of how caregiver communication influences interactions between healthcare providers and patients, particularly during gynecologic treatment visits. HCPs may perceive caregiver communication as helpful or challenging, and these triadic interactions may influence patient outcomes.

METHODS

Interviews with ten cancer specialist HCPs (medical assistants/technicians, nurse practitioners/registered nurses, oncologists) addressed experiences interacting with patients and caregivers.

RESULTS

Analyses revealed two themes concerning helpful communication: caregivers managing information and managing patient emotions. Three challenging themes include caregiver communication unsettling healthcare interactions, caregiver presence limiting patient communication, and caregiver engagement challenges.

CONCLUSION

HCPs evaluate caregiver communication as helpful and challenging. Findings suggest benefits of communication training for gynecologic cancer patients such as requesting privacy when interacting with HCPs, for caregivers to promote awareness of effects of their behavior, and for HCPs to help manage triadic interactions while supporting patient needs.

INNOVATION

HCP assessment of caregiver communication during gynecologic treatment visits offers unique insights regarding helpful and challenging behaviors contributing to implications for patient care and well-being. Applications may extend to other triadic interactions and cancer settings.

摘要

目的

护理人员常常陪伴患者参加与癌症相关的医疗预约。关于医疗服务提供者(HCPs)如何评估护理人员的沟通对医疗服务提供者与患者之间互动的影响,尤其是在妇科治疗就诊期间,相关研究有限。HCPs可能认为护理人员的沟通有帮助或具有挑战性,而这些三方互动可能会影响患者的治疗结果。

方法

对十位癌症专科HCPs(医疗助理/技术员、执业护士/注册护士、肿瘤学家)进行访谈,了解他们与患者及护理人员互动的经历。

结果

分析揭示了两个关于有帮助的沟通的主题:护理人员管理信息和管理患者情绪。三个具有挑战性的主题包括护理人员的沟通扰乱医疗互动、护理人员在场限制患者沟通以及护理人员参与方面的挑战。

结论

HCPs认为护理人员的沟通既有帮助又具有挑战性。研究结果表明,对妇科癌症患者进行沟通培训有诸多益处,比如患者在与HCPs互动时要求隐私,护理人员提高对自身行为影响的认识,以及HCPs在支持患者需求的同时帮助管理三方互动。

创新点

HCPs对妇科治疗就诊期间护理人员沟通的评估,为有助于患者护理和福祉的有帮助及具有挑战性的行为提供了独特见解。其应用可能扩展到其他三方互动和癌症治疗场景。

相似文献

1
Healthcare provider assessments of caregiver communication behaviors during gynecologic Cancer treatment appointments.
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 1;4:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Triadic Collaboration Between Adolescents, Caregivers, and Health-Care Providers to Promote Healthy Behavior.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Feb;74(2):358-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.054. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
5
Patient Interaction Involving Older Adults: Provider vs. Caregiver Expectations.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Sep 17;7(5):101. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7050101.
7
Aligned and Divergent Perceptions of Support Persons' Role in Triadic Gynecologic Cancer Communication.
Qual Health Res. 2022 Mar;32(4):710-724. doi: 10.1177/10497323211066868. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
A qualitative study of patients' and caregivers' perspectives on educating healthcare providers.
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Sep 14;12(4):7-16. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71541. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Improving Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Care: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives From a Multi-Methods Pilot Study.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 6;12:833195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833195. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Family caregiving in research and practice: Editorial - PEC innovation.
PEC Innov. 2025 Apr 30;6:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100396. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Breast cancer patient experiences with and preferences for time alone with their cancer care team.
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Sep;138:109178. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109178. Epub 2025 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer caregivers at the end-of-life: How much me vs. how much we?
PEC Innov. 2023 Jul 25;3:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100193. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
2
Openness and topic avoidance in interpersonal communication about ovarian cancer: An uncertainty management perspective.
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2022 Jan 31;5(3):9376. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2021.9376. eCollection 2021 Dec 31.
3
Validation of the transactional eHealth literacy instrument with cancer caregivers.
PEC Innov. 2022 Aug 19;1:100075. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100075. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Dilemmas and Strategy When Companion Participation During Appointments Differs from Patient and Companion Expectations.
Health Commun. 2024 May;39(5):876-887. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2190244. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
5
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Perceived importance of affective forecasting in cancer treatment decision making.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 Nov-Dec;38(6):687-701. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1768198. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
9
Illness uncertainty, coping, and quality of life among patients with prostate cancer.
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1019-1025. doi: 10.1002/pon.5372. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验