Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2018 Jun;31(6):965-973. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0013-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
The adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various organs may be attributed to immune-mediated processes triggered by disrupted self-tolerance; however, it remains unclear whether they are similar or dissimilar to classic organ-specific autoimmune diseases. The present study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features between checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury and acutely presenting autoimmune hepatitis or idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Seven patients treated with nivolumab (n = 5) or ipilimumab (n = 2) presented with liver dysfunction a median of 41 days (range 21-120) after the initiation of immunotherapy. All patients had elevated liver enzymes, whereas hyper-bilirubinemia was less common. None of the patients had antinuclear antibodies or IgG elevations. Stopping the immunotherapy and additional immunosuppression with corticosteroids normalized or decreased liver enzymes in all patients treated. Histologically, all biopsies showed predominantly lobular hepatitis with milder portal inflammation. Centrilobular confluent necrosis and plasmacytosis were observed in a single case, and were markedly less common and milder than those in autoimmune hepatitis (p = 0.017 and p < 0.001, respectively). Bile duct injury, micro-abscesses, and extramedullary hematopoiesis were also found in one case each. Immunostaining revealed the presence of large numbers of CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, whereas CD20+ B cells and CD4+ T cells were fewer in checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury than in autoimmune hepatitis or drug-induced liver injury. In conclusion, liver injury caused by cancer immunotherapy shares some features with injury of autoimmune hepatitis; however, there are obvious differences between the two conditions. Checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury may represent an immune-mediated, less zone-selective hepatocyte necrosis not requiring the strong activation of helper T cells and immunoglobulin production.
免疫检查点抑制剂在各种器官中的不良反应可能归因于自身耐受破坏引发的免疫介导过程;然而,目前尚不清楚它们与经典的器官特异性自身免疫性疾病是否相似或不同。本研究旨在比较检查点抑制剂诱导的肝损伤与急性表现的自身免疫性肝炎或特发性药物性肝损伤的临床病理特征。7 例接受纳武单抗(n = 5)或伊匹单抗(n = 2)治疗的患者在免疫治疗开始后中位 41 天(范围 21-120 天)出现肝功能障碍。所有患者的肝酶升高,而高胆红素血症则较少见。所有患者均无抗核抗体或 IgG 升高。停止免疫治疗并额外使用皮质类固醇免疫抑制可使所有接受治疗的患者的肝酶正常化或降低。所有活检均显示以肝小叶为主的肝炎,伴有较轻的门脉炎症。单个病例中观察到中央静脉融合性坏死和浆细胞增多,但比自身免疫性肝炎中的坏死和浆细胞增多明显更轻(p = 0.017 和 p < 0.001)。胆管损伤、微脓肿和骨髓外造血也各见于 1 例。免疫组化显示大量 CD3+和 CD8+淋巴细胞存在,而 CD20+B 细胞和 CD4+T 细胞在检查点抑制剂诱导的肝损伤中比在自身免疫性肝炎或药物性肝损伤中更少。总之,癌症免疫治疗引起的肝损伤与自身免疫性肝炎的损伤具有一些共同特征;然而,两者之间存在明显差异。检查点抑制剂诱导的肝损伤可能代表一种免疫介导的、非选择性更强的肝细胞坏死,不需要辅助性 T 细胞和免疫球蛋白产生的强烈激活。