Vogels R, Orban G A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 May;12(2):115-32. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.2.115.
The contribution of decision factors to the meridional variations in line orientation discrimination was determined for two-alternative forced-choice experimental designs. Using Johnson's (1980) formalization of decision processes in discrimination tasks, we identified three decision factors: the decision rule, memory variance, and criterial noise. In a first experiment, we showed the effect of experimental design on orientation discrimination to be similar at horizontal and oblique standard orientations, indicating that the meridional variations in orientation discrimination were not due to a decision rule anisotropy. In a second experiment, the effect of the interstimulus interval was also found to be similar at both standard orientations, suggesting that the memory variance is isotropic in the orientation domain. The results of two other experiments supported the hypothesis that the meridional variations in orientation discrimination are not due to a criterial noise anisotropy. These different results strongly suggested that the oblique effect in line orientation discrimination is due to sensorial factors rather than to decision factors. Therefore, they further support the hypothesis linking the anisotropy of the preferred orientation distribution of Area 17-S cells (a single physiologically defined class of cells in the primary visual cortex) and the meridional variations in line orientation discrimination.
针对二选一强制选择实验设计,确定了决策因素对线条方向辨别中子午线变化的贡献。使用约翰逊(1980年)对辨别任务中决策过程的形式化方法,我们确定了三个决策因素:决策规则、记忆方差和标准噪声。在第一个实验中,我们表明实验设计对水平和倾斜标准方向的方向辨别影响相似,这表明方向辨别中的子午线变化并非由于决策规则各向异性。在第二个实验中,还发现刺激间隔在两个标准方向上的影响也相似,这表明在方向域中记忆方差是各向同性的。另外两个实验的结果支持了以下假设:方向辨别中的子午线变化并非由于标准噪声各向异性。这些不同的结果有力地表明,线条方向辨别中的倾斜效应是由于感觉因素而非决策因素。因此,它们进一步支持了将17区S细胞(初级视觉皮层中一类单一的生理定义细胞)的偏好方向分布各向异性与线条方向辨别中的子午线变化联系起来的假设。