• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延迟持续时间对方向视觉工作记忆的影响。

The effects of delay duration on visual working memory for orientation.

作者信息

Shin Hongsup, Zou Qijia, Ma Wei Ji

机构信息

Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2017 Dec 1;17(14):10. doi: 10.1167/17.14.10.

DOI:10.1167/17.14.10
PMID:29234786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6097585/
Abstract

We used a delayed-estimation paradigm to characterize the joint effects of set size (one, two, four, or six) and delay duration (1, 2, 3, or 6 s) on visual working memory for orientation. We conducted two experiments: one with delay durations blocked, another with delay durations interleaved. As dependent variables, we examined four model-free metrics of dispersion as well as precision estimates in four simple models. We tested for effects of delay time using analyses of variance, linear regressions, and nested model comparisons. We found significant effects of set size and delay duration on both model-free and model-based measures of dispersion. However, the effect of delay duration was much weaker than that of set size, dependent on the analysis method, and apparent in only a minority of subjects. The highest forgetting slope found in either experiment at any set size was a modest 1.14°/s. As secondary results, we found a low rate of nontarget reports, and significant estimation biases towards oblique orientations (but no dependence of their magnitude on either set size or delay duration). Relative stability of working memory even at higher set sizes is consistent with earlier results for motion direction and spatial frequency. We compare with a recent study that performed a very similar experiment.

摘要

我们采用延迟估计范式来表征集合大小(1、2、4或6)和延迟持续时间(1、2、3或6秒)对方向视觉工作记忆的联合影响。我们进行了两项实验:一项实验中延迟持续时间是分块的,另一项实验中延迟持续时间是交错的。作为因变量,我们在四个简单模型中检验了四个无模型离散度指标以及精度估计。我们使用方差分析、线性回归和嵌套模型比较来测试延迟时间的影响。我们发现集合大小和延迟持续时间对无模型和基于模型的离散度测量均有显著影响。然而,延迟持续时间的影响比集合大小的影响弱得多,这取决于分析方法,并且仅在少数受试者中明显。在任何集合大小下,两个实验中发现的最高遗忘斜率为适度的1.14°/秒。作为次要结果,我们发现非目标报告率较低,并且对倾斜方向存在显著的估计偏差(但其大小与集合大小或延迟持续时间均无关)。即使在较高集合大小下工作记忆的相对稳定性也与先前关于运动方向和空间频率的结果一致。我们与最近进行了非常相似实验的一项研究进行了比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/feaf1aa5a35e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/23a048916b80/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/1ef9b6ac78f4/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/e9b5ab7cc78e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/6baf2c65e380/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/b1f820fda579/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/64c6f398bd6e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/3ad4334bc1ce/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/55e4e86f3510/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/e072e4ba5756/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/705be9dca818/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/744d684cd7a1/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/ee0ffb69602a/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/3fc833956687/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/98db1d030fdf/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/68de832f4b13/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/dc88e054e3f0/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/d713661af05e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/feaf1aa5a35e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/23a048916b80/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/1ef9b6ac78f4/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/e9b5ab7cc78e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/6baf2c65e380/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/b1f820fda579/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/64c6f398bd6e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/3ad4334bc1ce/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/55e4e86f3510/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/e072e4ba5756/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/705be9dca818/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/744d684cd7a1/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/ee0ffb69602a/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/3fc833956687/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/98db1d030fdf/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/68de832f4b13/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/dc88e054e3f0/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/d713661af05e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f19/6097585/feaf1aa5a35e/i1552-5783-17-14-10-f18.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of delay duration on visual working memory for orientation.延迟持续时间对方向视觉工作记忆的影响。
J Vis. 2017 Dec 1;17(14):10. doi: 10.1167/17.14.10.
2
Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall.视觉工作记忆中的高效编码解释了回忆中刺激特异性的变化。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;38(32):7132-7142. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1018-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect.视觉方向表征中各向异性的独立来源:视觉和认知倾斜效应
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Nov;233(11):3097-108. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4379-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
4
Recall of facial expressions and simple orientations reveals competition for resources at multiple levels of the visual hierarchy.对面部表情和简单方位的回忆揭示了视觉层次结构多个层面上对资源的竞争。
J Vis. 2019 Mar 1;19(3):8. doi: 10.1167/19.3.8.
5
Gradual formation of visual working memory representations of motion directions.运动方向视觉工作记忆表征的逐步形成。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):296-309. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1593-9.
6
Different features are stored independently in visual working memory but mediated by object-based representations.不同特征在视觉工作记忆中独立存储,但由基于对象的表征介导。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 14.
7
The effects of direction similarity in visual working memory: Behavioural and event-related potential studies.视觉工作记忆中方向相似性的影响:行为学与事件相关电位研究
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(9):1812-30. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1100206. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
Attention is required for maintenance of feature binding in visual working memory.在视觉工作记忆中维持特征绑定需要注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1191-213. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.852232. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
9
Working memory resources are shared across sensory modalities.工作记忆资源在各种感觉模态之间共享。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):1962-74. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0714-3.
10
Differential trajectories of memory quality and guessing across sequential reports from working memory.工作记忆连续报告中记忆质量和猜测的差异轨迹。
J Vis. 2019 Jul 1;19(7):3. doi: 10.1167/19.7.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Hippocampal sequences represent working memory and implicit timing.海马序列代表工作记忆和内隐计时。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 17:2025.03.17.643736. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.17.643736.
2
Linking Motor Working Memory to Explicit and Implicit Motor Learning.将运动工作记忆与显性和隐性运动学习相联系。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 27:2025.02.27.640657. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.27.640657.
3
EEG Correlates of Cognitive Dynamics in Task Resumption After Interruptions: The Impact of Available Time and Flexibility.中断后任务恢复中认知动态的脑电图相关性:可用时间和灵活性的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.考虑到精度方面特定于刺激的变化,揭示了视觉工作记忆中的离散容量限制。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):6-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000302.
2
Rapid forgetting results from competition over time between items in visual working memory.快速遗忘源于视觉工作记忆中各项目随时间的竞争。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):528-536. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000328. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Evaluating and excluding swap errors in analogue tests of working memory.
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Feb;61(4):e70027. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70027.
4
Robustly encoding certainty in a metastable neural circuit model.在一个亚稳态神经回路模型中稳健地编码确定性。
Phys Rev E. 2024 Sep;110(3-1):034404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.110.034404.
5
Dissecting the components of error in analogue report tasks.剖析模拟报告任务中的错误构成。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8196-8213. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02453-w. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
6
Representation and computation in visual working memory.视觉工作记忆中的表示和计算。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1016-1034. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
Attractor dynamics with activity-dependent plasticity capture human working memory across time scales.具有活动依赖可塑性的吸引子动力学在多个时间尺度上捕捉人类工作记忆。
Commun Psychol. 2023;1. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00027-8. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
8
Linking Cognitive Integrity to Working Memory Dynamics in the Aging Human Brain.将认知完整性与衰老人脑的工作记忆动态联系起来。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 26;44(26):e1883232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1883-23.2024.
9
A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory.一种动态神经资源模型架起了感觉记忆和工作记忆之间的桥梁。
Elife. 2024 May 3;12:RP91034. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91034.
10
Corvids optimize working memory by categorizing continuous stimuli.鸦科动物通过对连续刺激进行分类来优化工作记忆。
Commun Biol. 2023 Nov 6;6(1):1122. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05442-5.
评估并排除工作记忆模拟测试中的交换错误。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 13;6:19203. doi: 10.1038/srep19203.
4
Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior.从视觉皮层解码的感觉不确定性可预测行为。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1728-30. doi: 10.1038/nn.4150. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Partitioning neuronal variability.神经元变异性的分区。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Jun;17(6):858-65. doi: 10.1038/nn.3711. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Stimulus-specific variability in color working memory with delayed estimation.延迟估计下颜色工作记忆中的刺激特异性变异性。
J Vis. 2014 Apr 8;14(4):7. doi: 10.1167/14.4.7.
7
Noise in neural populations accounts for errors in working memory.神经群体中的噪声导致工作记忆错误。
J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 5;34(10):3632-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3204-13.2014.
8
Changing concepts of working memory.工作记忆概念的变化。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56. doi: 10.1038/nn.3655. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Factorial comparison of working memory models.工作记忆模型的析因比较。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):124-49. doi: 10.1037/a0035234.
10
Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox.使用MemToolbox对视觉工作记忆进行建模。
J Vis. 2013 Aug 20;13(10):9. doi: 10.1167/13.10.9.