Ackroyd N, Gill R, Griffiths K, Kossoff G, Appleberg M
J Vasc Surg. 1986 Jun;3(6):846-53.
Common carotid artery (CCA) blood flow was measured noninvasively with a pulsed Doppler duplex scanner modeled after the Octoson (Ultrasonics, Inc., No. Yonkers, N.Y.). The aim of the study was to determine normal values and to assess the accuracy of CCA flow as a predictor of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. One hundred one people who did not have disease were studied; the overall mean flow rate was 395 +/- 79 ml/min (mean +/- S.D.). There was no significant correlation with age, height, or body surface area but there was with body weight (p less than 0.05). A statistically significant difference was evident between men (424 +/- 88 ml/min) and women (371 +/- 62 ml/min) (p less than 0.001). The intrasessional variation (S.D./mean) was 13% and the intersessional variation, 16%. No significant difference was seen between the sides. Ninety-two patients who had carotid angiography were studied and the flow rates compared with the degree of ICA stenosis on each side. The flow rate for mild ICA stenosis (1% to 39%) was 404 +/- 109 ml/min, for moderate stenoses (40% to 69%), 390 +/- 91 ml/min, and for severe stenoses (70% to 99%), 351 +/- 109 ml/min. There was a significant difference in flows only between mild and severe grades of stenosis of the ICA (p less than 0.01). With unilateral stenosis, comparison of flow values in the normal and affected sides showed the greatest discriminatory power when the absolute difference of flow values was taken (p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
采用一款仿照Octoson(超声公司,纽约州扬克斯市)的脉冲多普勒双功能扫描仪对颈总动脉(CCA)血流进行无创测量。本研究的目的是确定正常值,并评估CCA血流作为颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄预测指标的准确性。对101名无疾病的人进行了研究;总体平均流速为395±79毫升/分钟(平均值±标准差)。与年龄、身高或体表面积无显著相关性,但与体重有相关性(p<0.05)。男性(424±88毫升/分钟)和女性(371±62毫升/分钟)之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。 session内变异(标准差/平均值)为13%,session间变异为16%。两侧之间未见显著差异。对92名进行了颈动脉血管造影的患者进行了研究,并将流速与每侧ICA狭窄程度进行了比较。轻度ICA狭窄(1%至39%)的流速为404±109毫升/分钟;中度狭窄(40%至69%)为390±91毫升/分钟;重度狭窄(70%至99%)为351±109毫升/分钟。仅在ICA轻度和重度狭窄等级之间的血流存在显著差异(p<小于0.01)。对于单侧狭窄,当采用血流值的绝对差异时,正常侧和患侧血流值的比较显示出最大的鉴别能力(p<0.005)。(摘要截断于250字)