Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
BK21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2812-2822. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5292-z. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
To compare the ability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters acquired from three different models for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis (HF).
Ninety-five patients underwent DWI using nine b values at 3 T magnetic resonance. The hepatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from a mono-exponential model, the true diffusion coefficient (D ), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D ) and perfusion fraction (f) from a biexponential model, and the distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and intravoxel heterogeneity index (α) from a stretched exponential model were compared with the pathological HF stage. For the stretched exponential model, parameters were also obtained using a dataset of six b values (DDC, α). The diagnostic performances of the parameters for HF staging were evaluated with Obuchowski measures and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The measurement variability of DWI parameters was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CoV).
Diagnostic accuracy for HF staging was highest for DDC (Obuchowski measures, 0.770 ± 0.03), and it was significantly higher than that of ADC (0.597 ± 0.05, p < 0.001), D (0.575 ± 0.05, p < 0.001) and f (0.669 ± 0.04, p = 0.035). The parameters from stretched exponential DWI and D showed higher areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) for determining significant fibrosis (≥F2) and cirrhosis (F = 4) than other parameters. However, D showed significantly higher measurement variability (CoV, 74.6%) than DDC (16.1%, p < 0.001) and α (15.1%, p < 0.001).
Stretched exponential DWI is a promising method for HF staging with good diagnostic performance and fewer b-value acquisitions, allowing shorter acquisition time.
• Stretched exponential DWI provides a precise and accurate model for HF staging. • Stretched exponential DWI parameters are more reliable than D from bi-exponential DWI model • Acquisition of six b values is sufficient to obtain accurate DDC and α.
比较三种模型获得的弥散加权成像(DWI)参数在诊断肝纤维化(HF)中的能力。
95 例患者在 3T 磁共振上使用 9 个 b 值进行 DWI。单指数模型的肝脏表观弥散系数(ADC)、双指数模型的真实弥散系数(D )、假性弥散系数(D )和灌注分数(f)以及扩展指数模型的分布弥散系数(DDC)和各向异性指数(α)与病理 HF 分期进行比较。对于扩展指数模型,还使用 6 个 b 值(DDC、α)数据集获得参数。采用 Obuchowski 指标和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估参数对 HF 分期的诊断性能。采用变异系数(CoV)评估 DWI 参数的测量变异性。
HF 分期的诊断准确性以 DDC 最高(Obuchowski 指标,0.770±0.03),明显高于 ADC(0.597±0.05,p<0.001)、D (0.575±0.05,p<0.001)和 f(0.669±0.04,p=0.035)。扩展指数 DWI 和 D 的参数显示出更高的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC),用于确定显著纤维化(≥F2)和肝硬化(F=4),优于其他参数。然而,D 显示出比 DDC(CoV,74.6%;p<0.001)和α(CoV,15.1%;p<0.001)更高的测量变异性。
扩展指数 DWI 是一种有前途的 HF 分期方法,具有良好的诊断性能和较少的 b 值采集,允许更短的采集时间。
· 扩展指数 DWI 为 HF 分期提供了一种精确、准确的模型。
· 扩展指数 DWI 参数比双指数 DWI 模型的 D 更可靠。
· 采集 6 个 b 值足以获得准确的 DDC 和α。