Chrispin Jonathan, Keramati Ali R, Assis Fabrizio R, Misra Satish, Zghaib Tarek, Berger Ronald D, Calkins Hugh, Tandri Harikrishna
Center of Excellence For Complex Inherited Arrhythmias, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;41(4):345-352. doi: 10.1111/pace.13299. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Prior studies identified a relationship between epicardial bipolar and endocardial unipolar voltage. Whether the relationship is valid with smaller multielectrode mapping catheters has not been reported. We explored the association of right ventricular (RV) endocardial unipolar voltage mapping with epicardial bipolar voltage mapping using a multielectrode mapping catheter.
Electrograms from patients who underwent multielectrode endocardial and epicardial RV electroanatomical mapping during ablation procedures were analyzed. Each endocardial mapping point was matched to the corresponding nearest epicardial point. The correlation between unipolar endocardial voltage and epicardial bipolar voltage was determined. The optimal unipolar threshold to detect epicardial low voltage (< 1.0 mV) and dense scar (0.5 mV) was calculated.
A total of 4,895 points were analyzed. There was a significant correlation between endocardial unipolar and epicardial bipolar voltage (Spearman rho = 0.499, P = < 0.001). The extent of the correlation was inversely associated with wall thickness. The receiver operator characteristic analysis of endocardial unipolar voltage predicting epicardial bipolar voltage of < 1.0 mV and < 0.5 showed an area under the curve of 0.769 and 0.812, respectively. The endocardial unipolar voltage that had the highest sensitivity and specificity in detecting epicardial bipolar voltage of < 1.0 mV and < 0.5 mV was 3.3 mV (70.3% sensitivity, 70.3% specificity), and 2.8 mV (sensitivity 73.8%, specificity 73.3%), respectively.
Epicardial low voltage of the RV can be assessed by unipolar endocardial voltage using small multielectrode catheters. The strength of the association was inversely correlated with the wall thickness.
先前的研究确定了心外膜双极电压与心内膜单极电压之间的关系。这种关系在较小的多电极标测导管中是否成立尚未见报道。我们使用多电极标测导管探讨了右心室(RV)心内膜单极电压标测与心外膜双极电压标测之间的关联。
分析了在消融手术期间接受多电极心内膜和心外膜RV电解剖标测的患者的心电图。每个心内膜标测点与相应的最近心外膜点匹配。确定了单极心内膜电压与心外膜双极电压之间的相关性。计算了检测心外膜低电压(<1.0 mV)和致密瘢痕(0.5 mV)的最佳单极阈值。
共分析了4895个点。心内膜单极电压与心外膜双极电压之间存在显著相关性(Spearman rho = 0.499,P = <0.001)。相关性程度与壁厚呈负相关。心内膜单极电压预测心外膜双极电压<1.0 mV和<0.5 mV的受试者工作特征分析显示,曲线下面积分别为0.769和0.812。在检测心外膜双极电压<1.0 mV和<0.5 mV时,敏感性和特异性最高的心内膜单极电压分别为3.3 mV(敏感性70.3%,特异性70.3%)和2.8 mV(敏感性73.8%,特异性73.3%)。
使用小型多电极导管通过单极心内膜电压可以评估RV的心外膜低电压。关联强度与壁厚呈负相关。