Boonruab Jurairat, Nimpitakpong Netraya, Damjuti Watchara
1 Thammasat University, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
2 Rajamangala University of Technology, Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2018 Jan-Dec;23:2156587217753451. doi: 10.1177/2156587217753451.
This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the distinctness after treatment among hot herbal compress, hot compress, and topical diclofenac. The registrants were equally divided into groups and received the different treatments including hot herbal compress, hot compress, and topical diclofenac group, which served as the control group. After treatment courses, Visual Analog Scale and 36-Item Short Form Health survey were, respectively, used to establish the level of pain intensity and quality of life. In addition, cervical range of motion and pressure pain threshold were also examined to identify the motional effects. All treatments showed significantly decreased level of pain intensity and increased cervical range of motion, while the intervention groups exhibited extraordinary capability compared with the topical diclofenac group in pressure pain threshold and quality of life. In summary, hot herbal compress holds promise to be an efficacious treatment parallel to hot compress and topical diclofenac.
这项随机对照试验旨在研究中药热敷、热敷和双氯芬酸局部用药治疗后的差异。将受试者平均分为几组,分别接受不同治疗,包括中药热敷组、热敷组和双氯芬酸局部用药组(作为对照组)。经过疗程治疗后,分别采用视觉模拟评分法和36项简明健康调查问卷来确定疼痛强度水平和生活质量。此外,还检查了颈椎活动范围和压痛阈值,以确定运动效果。所有治疗均显示疼痛强度水平显著降低,颈椎活动范围增加,而干预组在压痛阈值和生活质量方面比双氯芬酸局部用药组表现出更显著的效果。总之,中药热敷有望成为与热敷和双氯芬酸局部用药同样有效的治疗方法。