Shigemoto Yuki, Robitschek Christine
a Department of Psychological Sciences , Texas Tech University , Lubbock , Texas , USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Jul;66(5):350-359. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431900. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
This study examined the inconsistent relationship found between personal growth initiative (PGI) and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) by exploring potential subgroups. In addition, after identifying the subgroups, potential predictors of these subgroups were examined.
Participants were 534 undergraduate students who experienced a potentially traumatic event (PTE). Data collection occurred from March 2013 to December 2014.
Because this was a preliminary study, archival data was used. Participants consisted of students who experienced a PTE within the past three years.
Latent profile analysis indicated a five-class model as the best-fitting model. Direct exposure and intentionality of the event were significant predictors of class membership; length of time since event and gender did not predict class membership.
The current study provides a potential explanation of the inconsistent results between PGI and PTSS and also highlights the importance of acknowledging subgroups when utilizing PGI after a PTE.
本研究通过探索潜在亚组,考察个人成长主动性(PGI)与创伤后应激症状(PTSS)之间发现的不一致关系。此外,在确定亚组后,对这些亚组的潜在预测因素进行了考察。
参与者为534名经历过潜在创伤事件(PTE)的本科生。数据收集于2013年3月至2014年12月进行。
由于这是一项初步研究,使用了存档数据。参与者包括在过去三年内经历过PTE的学生。
潜在剖面分析表明,五类模型是最佳拟合模型。事件的直接暴露和意向性是类别归属的显著预测因素;事件发生后的时间长度和性别不能预测类别归属。
本研究为PGI与PTSS之间不一致的结果提供了一个潜在解释,同时也强调了在PTE后使用PGI时承认亚组的重要性。