• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychiatric service staff perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: a process evaluation study.精神科服务人员对实施共同决策工具的看法:一项过程评估研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1421352. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1421352.
2
Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services.服务使用者参与精神卫生服务决策的体验。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):688-97. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12246. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
3
To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.精神科患者在多大程度上参与他们的精神保健决策?与社会人口学、临床和心理学变量的关系。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2014 Dec;26(6):372-81. doi: 10.1017/neu.2014.21. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
4
Development and usability testing of a web-based decision support for users and health professionals in psychiatric services.针对精神科服务中用户和健康专业人员的基于网络的决策支持工具的开发与可用性测试。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017 Sep;40(3):293-302. doi: 10.1037/prj0000278. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
5
Barriers to shared decision making in mental health care: qualitative study of the Joint Crisis Plan for psychosis.精神卫生保健中共同决策的障碍:对精神病联合危机计划的定性研究
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):448-58. doi: 10.1111/hex.12368. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
6
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.从工作人员和服务使用者的角度对精神卫生保健中的共同决策进行的元民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9.
7
Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation.在美国退伍军人事务部(VHA)住院精神保健病房中,以康复为导向的护理背景下实施和工作人员对共同决策的理解:一项混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 30;12(5):e057300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057300.
8
Shared decision-making in mental health care-A user perspective on decisional needs in community-based services.精神卫生保健中的共同决策——基于社区服务中服务对象对决策需求的视角
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 May 9;11:30563. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30563. eCollection 2016.
9
Shared decision making in Swedish community mental health services - an evaluation of three self-reporting instruments.瑞典社区心理健康服务中的共同决策——三种自我报告工具的评估
J Ment Health. 2017 Apr;26(2):142-149. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1207223. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
10
Primary Care Physicians' Support of Shared Decision Making for Different Cancer Screening Decisions.初级保健医生对不同癌症筛查决策中共同决策的支持。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):70-78. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16660547. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living with Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review.从理想主义者到现实主义者——为精神病患者抗精神病药物处方选择设计并实施共享决策干预措施(SHAPE):一项现实主义综述
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):916-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf058.
2
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).从理想主义者到现实主义者——为精神病患者抗精神病药物处方选择设计并实施共享决策干预措施(SHAPE):一项现实主义综述(第2部分——设计共享决策干预措施:优化设计与本地实施)
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):932-948. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf059.
3
User and staff experiences of a revised process for coordinating support with shared decision making in the comorbidity field of practice: a qualitative interview study.在共病实践领域中,用户和工作人员对通过共享决策来协调支持的修订流程的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2447095. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2447095. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
4
Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施:对精神疾病患者结局证据的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70134. doi: 10.1111/hex.70134.
5
Zero Tolerance for Coercion? Historical, Cultural and Organisational Contexts for Effective Implementation of Coercion-Free Mental Health Services around the World.对强制手段零容忍?全球有效实施无强制心理健康服务的历史、文化和组织背景
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 27;11(21):2834. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212834.
6
Developing sustainable service user involvement practices in mental health services in Sweden: the "Userinvolve" research program protocol.在瑞典精神卫生服务中发展可持续的服务使用者参与实践:“用户参与”研究计划方案
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 12;14:1282700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1282700. eCollection 2023.
7
Methodologies for Evaluating the Usability of Rehabilitation Technologies Aimed at Supporting Shared Decision-Making: Scoping Review.评估旨在支持共同决策的康复技术可用性的方法:范围综述
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug 15;10:e41359. doi: 10.2196/41359.
8
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
The processes involved in the establishment of user-provider partnerships in severe psychiatric illnesses: a scoping review.在严重精神疾病中建立医患伙伴关系的相关过程:范围综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04303-5.
10
Development of the Everyday Life Rehabilitation model for persons with long-term and complex mental health needs: Preliminary process findings on usefulness and implementation aspects in sheltered and supported housing facilities.针对有长期复杂心理健康需求者的日常生活康复模式的开发:关于庇护性和支持性住房设施中实用性和实施方面的初步过程结果
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 16;13:954068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.954068. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and usability testing of a web-based decision support for users and health professionals in psychiatric services.针对精神科服务中用户和健康专业人员的基于网络的决策支持工具的开发与可用性测试。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017 Sep;40(3):293-302. doi: 10.1037/prj0000278. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
2
Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病的共同决策和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2159-2171. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Communication practices that encourage and constrain shared decision making in health-care encounters: Systematic review of conversation analytic research.促进和限制医疗保健互动中共同决策的沟通实践:对话分析研究的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1228-1247. doi: 10.1111/hex.12557. Epub 2017 May 18.
4
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.在常规精神卫生保健中实施共同决策。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.
5
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中实施共同决策:来自MAGIC项目的经验教训。
BMJ. 2017 Apr 18;357:j1744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j1744.
6
Patient participation in decision-making about cardiovascular preventive drugs - resistance as agency.患者参与心血管预防药物决策——作为能动性的阻力
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Sep;35(3):231-239. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1288814. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.放射肿瘤学中共同决策与患者决策辅助工具的综述
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):238-245. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1169-8.
8
Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences.实施共同决策:考虑所有后果。
Implement Sci. 2016 Aug 8;11:114. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9.
9
The Roles of System and Organizational Leadership in System-Wide Evidence-Based Intervention Sustainment: A Mixed-Method Study.系统和组织领导在全系统基于证据的干预措施维持中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Nov;43(6):991-1008. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0751-4.
10
Shared treatment decision-making and empowerment-related outcomes in psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.精神分裂症中共享的治疗决策和赋权相关结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;209(1):23-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158931. Epub 2016 May 19.

精神科服务人员对实施共同决策工具的看法:一项过程评估研究。

Psychiatric service staff perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: a process evaluation study.

作者信息

Schön Ulla-Karin, Grim Katarina, Wallin Lars, Rosenberg David, Svedberg Petra

机构信息

a School of Education, Health and Social Studies , Dalarna University , Falun , Sweden.

b Institution for Social Work , Karlstad University , Karlstad , Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1421352. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1421352.

DOI:10.1080/17482631.2017.1421352
PMID:29405889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5804774/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Shared decision making, SDM, in psychiatric services, supports users to experience a greater sense of involvement in treatment, self-efficacy, autonomy and reduced coercion. Decision tools adapted to the needs of users have the potential to support SDM and restructure how users and staff work together to arrive at shared decisions. The aim of this study was to describe and analyse the implementation process of an SDM intervention for users of psychiatric services in Sweden.

METHOD

The implementation was studied through a process evaluation utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methods. In designing the process evaluation for the intervention, three evaluation components were emphasized: contextual factors, implementation issues and mechanisms of impact.

RESULTS

The study addresses critical implementation issues related to decision-making authority, the perceived decision-making ability of users and the readiness of the service to increase influence and participation. It also emphasizes the importance of facilitation, as well as suggesting contextual adaptations that may be relevant for the local organizations.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that staff perceived the decision support tool as user-friendly and useful in supporting participation in decision-making, and suggest that such concrete supports to participation can be a factor in implementation if adequate attention is paid to organizational contexts and structures.

摘要

目的

在精神科服务中,共享决策(SDM)有助于服务使用者在治疗过程中获得更强的参与感、自我效能感和自主感,并减少强制治疗的情况。根据使用者需求定制的决策工具,有可能支持共享决策,并重塑使用者与工作人员共同做出共享决策的工作方式。本研究旨在描述和分析瑞典针对精神科服务使用者的共享决策干预措施的实施过程。

方法

通过运用定量和定性方法的过程评估来研究该实施过程。在设计干预措施的过程评估时,重点强调了三个评估要素:背景因素、实施问题和影响机制。

结果

该研究探讨了与决策权、使用者的决策能力认知以及服务机构提升影响力和参与度的意愿相关的关键实施问题。研究还强调了促进工作的重要性,并提出了可能适用于当地机构的背景调整建议。

结论

结果表明,工作人员认为决策支持工具对使用者友好且有助于支持参与决策,并表明如果充分关注组织背景和结构,这种对参与的具体支持可以成为实施过程中的一个因素。