Aarons Gregory A, Green Amy E, Trott Elise, Willging Cathleen E, Torres Elisa M, Ehrhart Mark G, Roesch Scott C
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (8012), La Jolla, CA, 92093-0812, USA.
Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Nov;43(6):991-1008. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0751-4.
If evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are not sustained, investments are wasted and public health impact is limited. Leadership has been suggested as a key determinant of implementation and sustainment; however, little empirical work has examined this factor. This mixed-methods study framed using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) conceptual framework examines leadership in both the outer service system context and inner organizational context in eleven system-wide implementations of the same EBI across two U.S. states and 87 counties. Quantitative data at the outer context (i.e., system) and inner context (i.e., team) levels demonstrated that leadership predicted future sustainment and differentiated between sites with full, partial, or no sustainment. In the outer context positive sustainment leadership was characterized as establishing a project's mission and vision, early and continued planning for sustainment, realistic project plans, and having alternative strategies for project survival. Inner context frontline transformational leadership predicted sustainment while passive-avoidant leadership predicted non-sustainment. Qualitative results found that sustainment was associated with outer context leadership characterized by engagement in ongoing supportive EBI championing, marketing to stakeholders; persevering in these activities; taking action to institutionalize the EBI with funding, contracting, and system improvement plans; and fostering ongoing collaboration between stakeholders at state and county, and community stakeholder levels. For frontline leadership the most important activities included championing the EBI and providing practical support for service providers. There was both convergence and expansion that identified unique contributions of the quantitative and qualitative methods. Greater attention to leadership in both the outer system and inner organizational contexts is warranted to enhance EBI implementation and sustainment.
如果基于证据的干预措施(EBIs)无法持续,投资将被浪费,对公共卫生的影响也将有限。领导力被认为是实施和维持的关键决定因素;然而,很少有实证研究考察这一因素。这项混合方法研究采用探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)概念框架,在美国两个州和87个县对同一EBI进行的11次全系统实施中,考察了外部服务系统背景和内部组织背景下的领导力。外部背景(即系统)和内部背景(即团队)层面的定量数据表明,领导力预示着未来的持续性,并能区分完全、部分或无持续性的场所。在外部背景下,积极的维持领导力的特点是确立项目的使命和愿景、早期并持续进行维持规划、制定现实的项目计划,以及拥有项目生存的替代策略。内部背景下的一线变革型领导力预示着持续性,而被动回避型领导力则预示着无持续性。定性结果发现,持续性与外部背景领导力相关,其特点是参与持续的支持性EBI倡导、向利益相关者进行推广;坚持这些活动;采取行动通过资金、合同和系统改进计划将EBI制度化;以及促进州、县和社区利益相关者层面的利益相关者之间的持续合作。对于一线领导力而言,最重要的活动包括倡导EBI并为服务提供者提供实际支持。定量和定性方法的独特贡献既有趋同之处,也有拓展之处。有必要更加关注外部系统和内部组织背景下的领导力,以加强EBI的实施和维持。