Moylan Carrie A, Hatfield Courtney, Randall Jenna
a School of Social Work, Michigan State University , East Lansing , MI , USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):445-449. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431914. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Despite popularity of climate surveys as a tool produce accurate data on campus sexual assault, little is known about how campuses are administering these surveys, what they are assessing, and what they are finding.
A sample of 105 campus climate survey reports was located with an internet search during the 2015-2016 academic year.
Review of climate survey reports assessed the methodology used, such as sampling method, use of incentives and sample size and response rate. Document review also assessed the topics included in the climate survey reports and key findings related to victimization, perpetration, and student knowledge of resources.
Most campuses reported victimization rates, but few reported perpetration rates. Students generally express confidence in their knowledge of campus resources, but reporting of sexual violence was low.
Climate surveys are inconsistent and do not always use scientifically sound measurement. Suggestions for improving climate surveys are discussed.
尽管校园气候调查作为一种获取校园性侵犯准确数据的工具很受欢迎，但对于校园如何开展这些调查、它们在评估什么以及得出了什么结果，人们知之甚少。
在2015 - 2016学年通过互联网搜索获得了105份校园气候调查报告样本。
对气候调查报告的审查评估了所使用的方法，如抽样方法、激励措施的使用、样本量和回复率。文件审查还评估了气候调查报告中包含的主题以及与受害情况、犯罪行为和学生对资源的了解相关的主要发现。
大多数校园报告了受害率，但很少有校园报告犯罪率。学生们普遍对自己对校园资源的了解表示有信心，但性暴力的报告率很低。
气候调查不一致，并不总是采用科学合理的测量方法。文中讨论了改进气候调查的建议。
