Edge W E, Kanter R K, Weigle C G, Walsh R F
Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical College, NY 12208.
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jul;22(7):1186-91. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199407000-00023.
We prospectively compared the occurrence of morbidity during high-risk interhospital transport in two types of transport systems: specialized tertiary center-based vs. nonspecialized, referring hospital-based.
Concurrent, prospective comparison of morbidity at two pediatric centers that use different types of transport team.
Two tertiary care pediatric intensive care units (ICU). The specialized team consisted of a pediatric resident, pediatric intensive care nurse, and a pediatric respiratory therapist. Comparison was made with referring institution transports by nonspecialized personnel to a second center. The two centers were similar in size and patient mix, with referral areas of similar population and rural/urban ratio.
One hundred forty-one patients transported to two tertiary pediatric ICUs.
None.
Two types of events were assessed: vital signs and other observable clinical events were described as "physiologic deteriorations." Events such as loss of intravenous access, endotracheal tube mishaps, and exhaustion of oxygen supply were described as "intensive care-related adverse events." Pretransport severity of illness and therapy were described by Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) scores. Only high-risk patients with PRISM scores of > or = 10 were analyzed. Intensive care-related adverse events occurred in one (2%) of 49 transports by the specialized team and 18 (20%) of 92 transports by nonspecialized personnel. The difference is statistically significant (p < .05). Physiologic deterioration was similar in the two groups occurring in five (11%) of 47 specialized team transports and 11 (12%) of 92 transports by the nonspecialized team.
We conclude that specialized pediatric teams can reduce transport morbidity. This is the first published study to compare two models of pediatric transport using identical definitions of severity and morbidity.
我们前瞻性地比较了两种转运系统在高危院际转运期间的发病情况:基于专科三级中心的转运系统与基于非专科转诊医院的转运系统。
对两个使用不同类型转运团队的儿科中心的发病情况进行同期前瞻性比较。
两个三级儿科重症监护病房(ICU)。专科团队由一名儿科住院医师、一名儿科重症监护护士和一名儿科呼吸治疗师组成。将其与非专科人员从转诊机构转运至第二个中心的情况进行比较。两个中心规模和患者构成相似,转诊地区的人口数量和城乡比例相近。
141名患者被转运至两个三级儿科ICU。
无。
评估了两类事件:生命体征及其他可观察到的临床事件被描述为“生理状况恶化”。诸如静脉通路丧失、气管插管失误和氧气供应耗尽等事件被描述为“重症监护相关不良事件”。通过儿科死亡风险(PRISM)和治疗干预评分系统(TISS)评分来描述转运前的疾病严重程度和治疗情况。仅对PRISM评分≥10的高危患者进行分析。专科团队转运的49例中有1例(2%)发生了重症监护相关不良事件,非专科人员转运的92例中有`18例(20%)发生了此类事件。差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两组的生理状况恶化情况相似,专科团队转运的47例中有5例(11%)出现,非专科团队转运的92例中有11例(12%)出现。
我们得出结论,专科儿科团队可降低转运期间的发病率。这是第一项发表的使用相同严重程度和发病率定义来比较两种儿科转运模式的研究。