Suppr超能文献

儿童虐待模式与成年抑郁患者共病的差异关联。

Differential associations between patterns of child maltreatment and comorbidity in adult depressed patients.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Lübeck University, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2018 Apr 1;230:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.077. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Types of maltreatment often co-occur and it is unclear how maltreatment patterns impact on comorbidity in depressed patients.

METHODS

We analysed associations of maltreatment patterns with a broad range of comorbidities assessed with diagnostic interviews in 311 treatment-seeking depressed outpatients.

RESULTS

Latent class analyses identified a "no maltreatment class" (39%), a "mild to moderate abuse and neglect class" (34%), a "severe abuse and neglect class" (14%) and a "severe neglect class" (13%). We found a dose-response association for the first three classes with comorbid disorders, a general psychopathology factor and an interpersonal insecurity factor. Patients in the "severe abuse and neglect" class had increased odds ratios (OR) of suffering from an anxiety disorder (OR 3.58), PTSD (OR 7.09), Borderline personality disorder (OR 7.97) and suicidality (OR 10.04) compared to those without child maltreatment. Patients in the "severe neglect" class did not have a higher risk for comorbidity than those in the "no maltreatment" class.

LIMITATIONS

Class sizes in the "severe abuse and neglect" and the "severe neglect" classes were small and findings should be replicated with other clinical and population samples.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher severity rather than the constellation of types of child abuse and neglect was associated with more comorbid disorders. An exception were patients reporting solely severe emotional and physical neglect who had a similar risk for comorbidity as patients without a history of child maltreatment. This may be associated with distinct learning experiences and may inform treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

虐待的类型往往同时发生,目前尚不清楚虐待模式如何影响抑郁患者的共病。

方法

我们分析了在 311 名寻求治疗的抑郁门诊患者中,通过诊断访谈评估的虐待模式与广泛共病之间的关联。

结果

潜在类别分析确定了“无虐待类别”(39%)、“轻度至中度虐待和忽视类别”(34%)、“严重虐待和忽视类别”(14%)和“严重忽视类别”(13%)。我们发现前三个类别与共病障碍、一般心理病理学因素和人际不安全感因素之间存在剂量反应关系。与没有儿童虐待的患者相比,处于“严重虐待和忽视”类别的患者患焦虑障碍(OR 3.58)、创伤后应激障碍(OR 7.09)、边缘型人格障碍(OR 7.97)和自杀意念(OR 10.04)的比值比更高。处于“严重忽视”类别的患者与处于“无虐待”类别的患者相比,共病风险没有更高。

局限性

“严重虐待和忽视”类和“严重忽视”类的类别规模较小,应在其他临床和人群样本中复制这些发现。

结论

较高的严重程度而非虐待类型的组合与更多的共病障碍相关。一个例外是仅报告严重的情感和身体忽视的患者,他们与没有儿童虐待史的患者共病风险相似。这可能与不同的学习经历有关,并可能为治疗决策提供信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验