• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测错误和未预测到的感觉输入的处理与注意力的相互作用不同。

The processing of mispredicted and unpredicted sensory inputs interact differently with attention.

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, National Taiwan Normal University, 10610 Taipei, Taiwan.

Jyväskylä Centre for Interdisciplinary Brain Research, Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.034
PMID:29407593
Abstract

Prediction and attention are fundamental brain functions in the service of perception. Interestingly, previous investigations found prediction effects independent of attention in some cases but attention-dependent in other cases. The discrepancy might be related to whether the prediction effect was revealed by comparing mispredicted event (where there is incorrect prediction) or unpredicted event (where there is no precise prediction) against predicted event, which are associated with different precision-weighted prediction error. Here we conducted a joint analysis on four published electroencephalography (EEG) datasets which allow for proper dissociation of mispredicted and unpredicted conditions when there was orthogonal manipulation of prediction and attention. We found that the mispredicted-versus-predicted contrast revealed an attention-independent effect of prediction suppression, whereas the unpredicted-versus-predicted contrast revealed a prediction effect that was reversed by attention on auditory N1. The results suggest that mispredicted and unpredicted processing interact with attention in distinct manners.

摘要

预测和注意是感知服务的基本大脑功能。有趣的是,之前的研究发现,在某些情况下,预测效应独立于注意,而在其他情况下则依赖于注意。这种差异可能与预测效应是通过将错误预测的事件(存在不正确的预测)与未预测的事件(没有精确预测)与预测的事件进行比较来揭示有关,这与不同的精度加权预测误差有关。在这里,我们对四个已发表的脑电图 (EEG) 数据集进行了联合分析,这些数据集允许在预测和注意的正交操作时对错误预测和未预测的条件进行适当的分离。我们发现,与预测的对比揭示了预测抑制的一种与注意无关的效应,而与预测的对比揭示了一种在听觉 N1 上被注意逆转的预测效应。结果表明,错误预测和未预测的处理与注意以不同的方式相互作用。

相似文献

1
The processing of mispredicted and unpredicted sensory inputs interact differently with attention.预测错误和未预测到的感觉输入的处理与注意力的相互作用不同。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
2
Distinctive Representation of Mispredicted and Unpredicted Prediction Errors in Human Electroencephalography.人类脑电图中错误预测和未预测预测误差的独特表征。
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 28;35(43):14653-60. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-15.2015.
3
Both contextual regularity and selective attention affect the reduction of precision-weighted prediction errors but in distinct manners.情境规律性和选择性注意都会影响精确加权预测误差的减少,但方式不同。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Mar;58(3):e13753. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13753. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
4
Context-dependent minimisation of prediction errors involves temporal-frontal activation.语境相关的预测错误最小化涉及颞额激活。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116355. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116355. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Hierarchical modulation of auditory prediction error signaling is independent of attention.听觉预测误差信号的分层调节与注意力无关。
Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jul;11(3):132-142. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1648404. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Temporal attention is involved in the enhancement of attentional capture with task difficulty: an event-related brain potential study.时间注意力参与了随着任务难度增加而增强的注意捕获:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neuroreport. 2017 Aug 16;28(12):755-759. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000837.
7
The auditory N1 suppression rebounds as prediction persists over time.随着预测随时间持续存在,听觉N1抑制会出现反弹。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Timing in Predictive Coding: The Roles of Task Relevance and Global Probability.预测编码中的时间安排:任务相关性和全局概率的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 May;29(5):780-792. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01085. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
Bayesian Mapping Reveals That Attention Boosts Neural Responses to Predicted and Unpredicted Stimuli.贝叶斯映射揭示了注意力增强了对预测和未预测刺激的神经反应。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 May 1;28(5):1771-1782. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx087.
10
Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.利用时间可预测性:听觉分心任务中与任务支持性时间线索处理相关的事件相关电位
Brain Res. 2016 May 15;1639:120-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.044. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling decision-making biases.决策偏差建模
Front Comput Neurosci. 2023 Oct 20;17:1222924. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1222924. eCollection 2023.
2
Human Brain Ages With Hierarchy-Selective Attenuation of Prediction Errors.人类大脑随层级选择性预测误差衰减而衰老。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Mar 5;31(4):2156-2168. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa352.
3
Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.评估预测加工作为感知模型的神经生理学证据。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Mar;1464(1):242-268. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14321. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
4
Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.语境促进视词汇识别:来自视觉和词汇但非词汇前加工的证据。
eNeuro. 2019 May 9;6(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0321-18.2019. Print 2019 Mar/Apr.
5
Prior Precision Modulates the Minimization of Auditory Prediction Error.先前精度调节听觉预测误差的最小化。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 15;13:30. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00030. eCollection 2019.