Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Bloodworks Northwest, 921 Terry Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Thromb Res. 2018 Mar;163:138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.01.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Despite high rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with hematologic malignancies, few tools exist to assist providers in identifying those patients at highest risk for this potentially fatal complication. Laboratory biomarkers, such as d-dimer, have demonstrated utility in some clinical settings to distinguish patients at increased risk.
We performed a systematic review of the literature utilizing search terms including "biomarker", "venous thromboembolism", "hematologic malignancy", "lymphoma", "myeloma" and "leukemia" in the Medline database. A total of 25 studies investigating laboratory biomarkers of increased thrombotic risk in the setting of hematologic malignancy were identified and included in this review.
The most studied biomarkers, d-dimer and fibrinogen, demonstrated some degree of efficacy in identifying high-risk patients at levels >4.0 mg/L or <1.0 g/L respectively. Additional markers which demonstrated promise included thrombin generation, mean platelet volume, soluble VEGF, soluble P-selectin and extracellular vesicles. Other biomarkers reviewed, which did not consistently demonstrate significant associations with VTE included prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, factor VIII, protein C, protein S, von Willebrand antigen and activity, antithrombin, thrombin antithrombin complex, antiphospholopid antibody, plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor and several variants associated with known hypercoagulable states (factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene variant, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase variant). Data to support any of the biomarkers discussed here in routine clinical decision-making are currently lacking, but additional investigation in clinical studies, ideally in combination with clinical factors known to be associated with increased thrombotic risk, is warranted.
尽管血液恶性肿瘤患者的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)发生率较高,但目前几乎没有工具可以帮助医生确定那些存在这种潜在致命并发症高风险的患者。实验室生物标志物,如 D-二聚体,在某些临床环境中已证明具有用于区分高风险患者的效用。
我们在 Medline 数据库中使用了包括“生物标志物”、“静脉血栓栓塞”、“血液恶性肿瘤”、“淋巴瘤”、“骨髓瘤”和“白血病”在内的搜索词进行了系统的文献回顾。共确定了 25 项研究,这些研究调查了血液恶性肿瘤背景下增加血栓形成风险的实验室生物标志物,并将其纳入了本次综述。
最受研究的生物标志物 D-二聚体和纤维蛋白原在分别>4.0mg/L 或<1.0g/L 时显示出一定程度的识别高危患者的有效性。其他显示出前景的标志物包括凝血酶生成、平均血小板体积、可溶性 VEGF、可溶性 P-选择素和细胞外囊泡。其他综述的生物标志物,如凝血酶原片段 F1+2、因子 VIII、蛋白 C、蛋白 S、血管性血友病抗原和活性、抗凝血酶、凝血酶抗凝血酶复合物、抗磷脂抗体、纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂、组织因子途径抑制剂以及几种与已知高凝状态相关的变体(因子 V 莱顿、凝血酶原基因变体、亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶变体),并没有一致显示出与 VTE 的显著关联。目前缺乏任何一种生物标志物在常规临床决策中的支持数据,但需要在临床研究中进一步研究,理想情况下是与已知与血栓形成风险增加相关的临床因素相结合。